Abstract:Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Using Contacts is Hardly Beneficial: the Treatment Effects of Using Social Capital

Social Capital and Homophily Both Matter for Labor Market Outcomes - Evidence from Replication and Extension

Social Capital and Job Search in Urban China: The Strength-of-Strong-Ties Hypothesis Revisited

It’s more complicated than we think: The implications of social capital on innovation

Occupational Interactions and Income Level: a Social Capital Study Using the First-Order Difference Method

Measuring the Labor Market Effects of Social Capital:A literature review and research strategy of dealing with the endogeneity problem

Is Being Connected to Leaders Always Beneficial? Instrumental Interaction and the Development of Social Capital Within Organisational Networks

The Causal Effect of Social Capital in the Labor Market Identification Challenges and Strategies

The Causal Effect of Social Capital in the Labor Market

Contextual effects of social integration and disintegration on health status: evidence from South Korea

Benefits and Pitfalls of Social Capital for Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China

Diversity of Social Network and Labor Market Outcome:A study on how social contacts affect the wage of migrant workers

Social Capital and Self-Rated Health: Empirical Evidence from China

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

Social Contacts, Dutch Language Proficiency and Immigrant Economic Performance in the Netherlands: A Longitudinal Study

Social Capital, Financial Lending, and Household Income—An Empirical Study from China

The impact of social status on the formation of collaborative ties and effort provision: An experimental study1

The impact of social status on the formation of collaborative ties and effort provision: An experimental study

Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Social Ties and Citizen-Initiated Contacts: the Case of China's Local One-Stop Governments