Social Capital and Homophily Both Matter for Labor Market Outcomes - Evidence from Replication and Extension

Yunsong Chen,Beate Volker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.10.003
IF: 4.144
2015-01-01
Social Networks
Abstract:Social resource theory has been challenged, as the effects of contact resources on job outcomes may be spurious given the presence of homophily. We review the Mouw-Lin debate and propose that occupational homophily moderates the role of contact resources in the labor market and that effects of resources depend on labor market institutions. We analyze data from the US, East Germany before 1989, and post-reform China, combining the first-difference method and Heckman selection procedure to deal with endogeneity. Empirical findings from different labor market contexts demonstrate that: (1) contact resources have a causal and positive role in job outcomes; (2) in a market economy, the role of resources is more salient if they provide within-occupation job-leads; (3) under state job-assignment systems occupational homophily does not pay off; and (4) job-search ties can take the form of heterophilous selection. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?