Abstract:Capturing CO2 out of flue gases emitted from power plants is an efficient way to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect. The commonly used method to capture CO2 is to chemically absorb it with amine solutions. The mostly used are aqueous solutions and the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is an effective choice to absorb CO2 with high reaction rate. However, the regeneration energy consumption is too high to be applied into industry efficiently. The main reason is due to the high boiling point, thus the non-aqueous solvent is a good alternative. In this paper, experiment is carried out to investigate the substituteion of water by methanol as the boiling point of it is no more than 343 K. during the experiment, 30%wt MEA aqueous and non-aqueous solutions were studied to absorb CO2 and the pure CO2 gases and simulated gas mixture of 12% CO2 and 88% N2 were studied, respectively. The jacket reactor was used to control the reaction temperature and the jacket spiral cooling pipe was used to cool the outlet gases from the reactor and separate the evaporated solutions. The temperature of the cooling water is 20°C. With the gas flow meter, it is easy to control and record the gas mass flow. And the gas analyzer was used to analyze the component of the mixed outlet gas. Every reaction courses were repeated several times to validate the accuracy. After the compensation of temperature, zero and evaporation, the absorption results were achieved and the CO2 absorption rate along time was obtained and absorption capacities in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions were easily observed. The results show that when the gas is pure CO2, the reaction rates for MEA aqueous solution is higher than that of non-aqueous solution at first, however, the different gap is little. Then after about 15 min, the reaction rate for MEA non-aqueous solution becomes higher than that of aqueous one as its reaction rate decreases. And the absorption capacity of non-aqueous solution is almost 0.1 mol CO2/mol MEA higher than that of aqueous solution. For the mixed gases, the reaction process is much lower than that of the pure CO2 gas. The results show that during the reaction process, the reaction rate of CO2 absorbing in non-aqueous solution is higher than that of aqueous and the CO2 absorption capacity in non-aqueous solution is also larger than that of aqueous. Also, the reaction time for pure CO2 is about 50min and for mixed gas is about 140min. Hence, the non-aqueous solutions have better CO2 absorption performance than the aqueous ones. Also, regeneration experiments were performed and the results show that the temperature ranges of 60-70°C are suitable for the CO2 loaded MEA-methanol solutions. When the temperature is higher than 70°C, methanol is preferable to be evaporated than the CO2 to be regenerated. Thus, the suitable regeneration temperature for MEA-methanol solution is no more than 70°C, which can reduce a large amount of energy in CO2 regeneration process. However, the obvious disadvantage for the non-aqueous solution is that the evaporation of the solution (methanol)

Study on Regeneration Characteristics of Choline Chloride-Monoethanolamine Deep Eutectic Solvent after Capturing Co2 from Biogas

Effect of Operating Parameters on CO 2 Capture from Biogas with Choline Chloride—monoethanolamine Deep Eutectic Solvent and Its Aqueous Solution

Efficient CO<sub>2</sub> capture by a novel deep eutectic solvent through facile, one-pot synthesis with low energy consumption and feasible regeneration

Effect of operating parameters on CO2 capture from biogas with choline chloride—monoethanolamine deep eutectic solvent and its aqueous solution

Understanding the CO2 capture performance by MDEA-based deep eutectics solvents with excellent cyclic capacity

Study on the Effect of Operating Parameters Towards CO2 Absorption Behavior of Choline Chloride – Monoethanolamine Deep Eutectic Solvent and Its Aqueous Solutions

Experimental Study on the Effect of Water Addition to ChCl-MEA DES Towards Its Performance in CO2 Removal from Syngas

Molecular Mechanism and Absorption Performance Evaluation of CO2 Capture from the PCC Process by Monoethanolamine-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents

Experimental And Rate-Based Modeling Study Of Co2 Capture By Aqueous Monoethanolamine

Experimental Study of the Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Several Candidate Solvents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Experimental Study on Regeneration Characteristics of CO2-rich Blended Amine Solution Using Membrane Vacuum Regeneration Technology

Absorption-Desorption Characteristics of the Synthesized Deep Eutectic Solvents for Carbon Dioxide Capture

Experiment Study on CO 2 Absorption and Desorption in the Non-Aqueous Blended Solutions of MEA and Methanol

Experimental research on chemical desorption based on CO2-rich absorption solutions

Experimental study on CO2 capture by MEA/ n-butanol/H2O phase change absorbent

Experimental Study of Regeneration Performance for CO2 Desorption from a Hybrid Solvent MEA‐methanol in a Stripper Column Packed with Three Different Packing: Sulzer BX500, Mellapale Y500 and Pall Rings 16 × 16

CO2 Desorption from Rich Alkanolamine Solution by Using Membrane Vacuum Regeneration Technology

Efficient and reversible absorption of HCl gas by ChCl-based deep eutectic solvents-Insights into the absorption behavior and mechanism

Co(2) Chemical Absorption by Using Membrane Vacuum Regeneration Technology

Integration Study of a Hybrid Solvent MEA-Methanol for Post Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture in Packed Bed Absorption and Regeneration Columns

Development of green solvents for efficient post-combustion CO2 capture with good regeneration performance