Ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells with a Passivated Back Interface: A Comparative Study Between Mo and In2O3:Sn Back Contacts

Yong Li,Guanchao Yin,Ye Tu,Setareh Sedaghat,Yao Gao,Martina Schmid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c00088
IF: 6.4
2022-01-01
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Abstract:Point-contact passivation layers have been proven beneficial in most solar cells (SCs). However, the latest theoretical simulations suggested that a high back-contact recombination velocity S-b can also be beneficial in ultrathin CIGSe (Cu(In,Ga)Se-2) SCs if they have a relatively high back potential barrier height Eh. SCAPS simulations predicted that a high S-b will deteriorate the SC efficiency Eff when E-h is in the range of 0-0.17 eV (Ohmic contact). Yet, when E-h is greater than 0.17 eV (Schottky contact), a high S-b can also diminish the current limitation arising from the back Schottky diode since it has a reverse direction to the main p-n junction. Therefore, a high S-b can support the carriers in passing the Schottky barrier via recombination, thus enhancing the cell performance. This work aims to verify the simulation prediction in practical experiments. To achieve different S-b values, we fabricate SiO2 passivation layers with point contacts of various dimensions by nanosphere lithography. The passivation effects are studied comparatively on Mo and ITO (In2O3:Sn) back contacts. The emphasis is on Eh, which is marginal for Mo but acts Schottky-like on ITO. We show that for Mo-based solar cells, the E-h is trivial; hence, a high S-b (without SiO2 passivation) deteriorates the efficiency. In contrast, on ITO, the reference sample without SiO2 shows less current limitation than the passivated ones, implying that a high S-b improves the efficiency. Comparing the differences of SiO2 on Mo and ITO back contacts in experiments, with the contrasting behavior of S-b on Ohmic and Schottky contacts in simulation, we conclude that E-h decides about the role of S-b in ultrathin CIGSe SCs. These findings deepen the understanding of the Schottky back contact and pave the way for future optimization of bifacial semitransparent ultrathin CIGSe SCs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?