Abstract:Existing auditing literature focuses exclusively on rational incentives of investors, managers, and auditors to demand and supply high audit quality, ignoring the potential effect of behavior bias such as sentiment on audit quality. Investors and managers with high sentiment might pay less attention to audited financial statements in their decisions, which lowers their demand for audit quality. Auditors might lower their supply of audit quality if they share the same sentiment or they expect weaker investor monitoring from high sentiment investors, which could reduce auditors’ perceived litigation, reputation, and regulatory risk. We take advantage of the unique Chinese data on audit inputs because the input-based measures are directly under auditors’ control and less confounded than output-based audit quality measures. We find that high sentiment is associated with lower likelihood of audit adjustments and fewer audit hours, consistent with auditors providing low audit effort when sentiment is high. We also find that high sentiment is associated with lower likelihood of modified audit opinions and higher absolute discretionary accruals, consistent with auditors providing low quality outputs when sentiment is high. Cross-sectional analyses show that the effect of sentiment on audit quality is more pronounced for small audit firms, low regulation risk periods, larger clients, and optimistic sentiment. Finally, we show that the effect of sentiment on the output-based audit quality measures is generalizable to the U.S. Our paper is the first to identify behavior biases as a determinant of the clients’ demand and auditors’ supply of audit quality.

Estimation and Interpretation of Individual Auditor's Effects on Audit Quality Measures: Evidence from China

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Study on Foreign Research about Auditor Quality:The Impact of Demand and Supply

Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data

Individual Auditor Social Responsibility and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

A Study on the Relation between Client's Influence and Audit Quality from the Perspective of Individual Auditor

What Do We Know about the Variance of Audit Quality? an Empirical Study from the Perspective of Individual Auditor

The scale and scope of the client portfolio and audit quality at the individual auditor level: evidence from China

The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

Do auditors change their individual style? Examining the effects of client importance and competition on auditors' influence on earnings comparability in China

Do Individual Auditors Have Their Own Styles? Evidence from Clients' Financial Statement Comparability in China

The Contagion Effect of Low-Quality Audits at the Level of Individual Auditors

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

Employee Quality and Audit Fee: Evidence from China

Sentiment and Audit Quality

How Personality Traits and Professional Skepticism Affect Auditor Quality? A Quantitative Model

The Impact Of Audit Committees Personal Characteristics On Earnings Management: Evidence From China

Do Regulations Limiting Management Influence over Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from China

The Scale and Scope of the Client Portfolio and Audit Pricing at the Individual Auditor Level: Evidence from China

Financial Distress, Investment Opportunity, and the Contagion Effect of Low Audit Quality: Evidence from China