Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate whether and how auditors responded to the documented increases in earnings management after split-share structure reform (SSSR) in China, as manifested in auditors’ propensity to issue modified audit opinions (MAOs) after the SSSR. This study further investigates how client importance and auditor size influence auditors’ response to earnings management after the SSSR. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts logit regression models to investigate auditors’ propensity to issue MAOs to their clients that appear to manage earnings after the SSSR. Initially, including all Chinese publicly listed firms from the CSMAR database, the sample for final analyses consists of 21,904 firm-year observations for 1,290 unique listed firms during the period 2001–2020. The sample period surrounds the implementation of the SSSR, which started in 2005, allowing the examination of auditors’ propensity to issue MAOs after vis-à-vis before the SSSR. Findings The authors find that non-Big10 auditors in China were less likely to issue MAOs to their economically important clients who appear to manage earnings after SSSR. However, in the years of non-tradeable shares being released to the markets, both Big10 and non-Big10 auditors were less likely to issue MAOs to their economically important clients who appear to manage earnings. The findings suggest that auditors may have compromised auditor independence in response to earnings management after the SSSR, likely due to the pressure from their economically important clients. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature, specifically the practice and theory in auditing, by shedding light on ever-changing auditors’ reporting behaviour, especially with regard to auditor independence. It also adds to the growing body of literature on the impact of institutional changes on auditing practices worldwide. The findings of this study further suggest that the recently documented declining demand for high-quality audits after the SSSR may be motivated by the clients’ intention to manage earnings after the SSSR.

Do auditors change their individual style? Examining the effects of client importance and competition on auditors' influence on earnings comparability in China

Do Individual Auditors Have Their Own Styles? Evidence from Clients' Financial Statement Comparability in China

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Do Firms That Have a Common Signing Auditor Exhibit Higher Earnings Comparability?

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

How a Shared Auditor Affects Firm-Pair Comparability: Implications of Both Firm and Individual Audit Styles

A Structuralist Analysis on the Determinants of Audit Market Structure

The Effect of Engagement Auditors on Financial Statement Comparability

Audit partner style and financial statement comparability: New evidence from the US market

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Does Auditor Style Influence Non-GAAP Reporting?

Common Individual Auditors and Analyst Forecast Performance

Auditors' Ability to Resist Client Pressure and Culture: Perceptions in China and the United Kingdom

The joint effects of social identity and institutional pressures on audit quality: The case of the Chinese Audit Industry

Auditors under Fire: the Association Between Audit Errors and the Career Setbacks of Individual Auditors

Auditors’ response to earnings management after split-share structure reform in China

The scale and scope of the client portfolio and audit quality at the individual auditor level: evidence from China

Comparative Study on the Impact of Auditor Rotation Regulation

Do different cooling-off modes affect audit quality? A study based on the audit rotation system in China

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients