Sulfate Attack Resistance of Tricalcium Silicate Modified with Nano-Silica and Scms

Zhaoheng Guo,Pengkun Hou,Zhenhai Xu,Jianming Gao,Yasong Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3973736
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:The durability of cement-based materials servicing in the sulfate-rich environment is a big concern due to sulfate attack. Tricalcium silicate (C 3 S), the most crucial component in Portland cement, determines the durability of cementitious materials. This research studied the effect of nano-silica (NS) on the sulfate attack resistance of the C 3 S hydration system from the aspects of strength development, phase assemblage, visual appearance, 3-dimensional cracks, and gel property changes under sulfate attack. In addition, comparative studies supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as silica fume (SF), fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) were made. To avoid the influence of transport of sulfate on the sulfate resistance of different samples, the 3 mm thick C 3 S paste sample were prepared and soaked in sulfate solution. Results showed that NS retarded the sulfate attack process in the C 3 S system, by preventing the expansive transformation of CH to gypsum, even if the C 3 S slices (3 mm thickness) were completely saturated with sulfate. In addition, only minor cracks and deterioration in NS-added C 3 S system was found, whereas more cracks and deterioration were found in the SCMs added samples, based on the visual appearance and tomography techniques. The lower sulfate resistance of systems with SCMs leaded to higher CH consumption during the sulfate attack. Furthermore, higher aluminum content in FA and GGBS would increase the amount of the secondly generated expansive ettringite and cause more serious deterioration. In addition, NMR results revealed that the polymerization degree of the C-(A)-S-H gel in the systems with SCMs would increase in the early stage of sulfate attack. The C-(A)-S-H gel in the systems with FA and GBBS was more easily decomposed in sulfate attack, compared with C-S-H gel. C-S-H in the NS-modified samples had higher sulfate attack resistance than that in the SF/GGBS/FA modified ones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?