Abstract:Emerging smart technology spawns many start-up firms, which enter into the market and bring more instability and uncertainty to supply chains. This paper develops a game-theoretic model which captures the most crucial factors in market entry stage, such as market uncertainty, competition, contract design, distribution channel, and sustainability. We consider a supply chain consisting of one supplier and two retailers (an incumbent and an entrant). We assume that the incumbent first enters a market and possesses private information about market demand. The entrant encroaches upon the market after observing its big growth potentials. In this paper, we study how the supplier optimally designs the contract for the retailers under asymmetric information to make the supply chain more efficient and sustainable. Subsequently, we investigate the preference of contractual forms between a franchise contract (FC) and a two-part tariff contract (TTC), from the perspectives of the supplier, the incumbent retailer, and the whole supply chain, respectively. It turns out that the supplier prefers the TTC while the incumbent is better off under the FC when the demand variation is relatively high. In addition, we find that the TTC is beneficial to the whole supply chain in most cases. In other words, TTC can promote the coordination of the supply chain and realize the sustainable development of the supply chain. We further analyze the impact of the entrant entry on the supplier’s contract design for the incumbent. The supplier tends to charge the lower wholesale price and less franchise fee for the incumbent after the entrant entry. The supplier’s contract strategy is conducive to maintaining the horizontal competition and promoting the sustainability of the supply chain. We also analyze the supplier’s distribution channel decision and find that she is more willing to block the entrant from entering the market in most cases because the incumbent with the private demand information makes the supply chain more efficient. Finally, we also extend our results by altering some assumption in the basic model.

Decision Structure and Outcomes in Technology Supply Chains

Decision Structure and Performance of Networked Technology Supply Chains

Technology licensing contract design considering royalty transparency and demand information asymmetry with downstream co-opetition

Strategic Technology Licensing in a Supply Chain.

Managing a Supply-Chain Based Two-Sided Market

Impact Of Information Sharing Modes On The Dual-Channel Closed Loop Supply Chains Under Different Power Structures

Open or Closed? Technology Sharing, Supplier Investment, and Competition

Control structure of competitive supply chain under network externality and uncertainty

Pricing Decision for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Technology Licensing under Collection and Remanufacturing Cost Disruptions

Control structure of chain to chain competition under network externality and product substitutability

Information Sharing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Learning Effect and Technology Licensing

Contract design under asymmetric demand information for sustainable supply chain practices

Information Structures and Pricing Decisions in Competing Supply Chains

Vertical R&D Alliance for Competing Supply Chains When Downstream Firms Are Leaders

Investment Decision-Making of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Driven by Big Data Technology

A Stackeberg Game of Profit Division in a Two-Stage Supply Chain with Interdependent Firms of Information Asymmetry

Chain-to-Chain Competition Under Demand Uncertainty

Optimization and Coordination of Decentralized Supply Chains with Vertical Cross-Shareholding

Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms

On Revenue Sharing Contract Of Supply Chain Technology Innovation Under Uncertainty Market Demand

The decision model of vertical structure under Stackelberg game among supply chains