Preparation and electrochemical performance of Pr2Ni0.6Cu0.4O4 cathode materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells
Yifang Wang,Jigui Cheng,Qiumei Jiang,Junfang Yang,Jianfeng Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.106
IF: 9.2
2011-01-01
Journal of Power Sources
Abstract:Cathode material Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 (PNCO) for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs) is synthesized by a glycine–nitrate process using Pr 6 O 11 , NiO, and CuO powders as raw materials. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that nanosized Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 powders with K 2 NiF 4 -type structure can be obtained from calcining the precursors at 1000 °C for 3 h. Scanning electron microscopy shows that the sintered PNCO samples have porous microstructure with a porosity of more than 30% and grain size smaller than 2 μm. A maximum conductivity of 130 S cm −1 is obtained from the PNCO samples sintered at 1050 °C. A single fuel cell based on the PNCO cathode with 30 μm Sm 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 1.9 (SCO) electrolyte film and a 1 mm NiO–SCO anode support is constructed. The ohmic resistance of the single Ni–SCO/SCO/PNCO cell is 0.08 Ω cm 2 and the area specific resistance (ASR) value is 0.19 Ω cm 2 at 800 °C. Cell performance was also tested using humidified hydrogen (3% H 2 O) as fuel and air as oxidant. The single cell shows an open circuit voltage of 0.82 V and 0.75 V at 700 °C and 800 °C, respectively. Maximum power density is 238 mW cm −2 and 308 mW cm −2 at 700 °C and 800 °C, respectively. The preliminary tests have shown that Pr 2 Ni 1− x Cu x O 4 materials can be a good candidate for cathode materials of IT-SOFCs. Keywords Solid oxide fuel cell Cathode materials Glycine–nitrate process Electrochemical performance 1 Introduction Solid oxide fuel cell has been considered as one of the most promising energy conversion devices due to their high energy conversion efficiency, less emission of pollutants and flexibility of fuels [1,2] . In particular, the possibility of direct utilization of hydrocarbon and renewable fuels (e.g., methane and ethanol) will greatly reduce the cost of SOFC technology [3] . A conventional SOFC generally operates at high temperature (>800 °C), which not only leads to complex material degradation and reaction, but also limits material choice of the cell components [4] . Therefore, much work has been done to reduce the operating temperature of SOFC to low to intermediate temperature range (600–800 °C). However, as the operating temperature decreases, the cathode overpotential and interfacial resistances between the electrolyte and electrodes, especially cathode, also increase, leading to lower cell performance [5] . There are two ways to solve this problem. One is to use composite cathode materials to increase the areas of the triple phase boundary (TPB). Another is to find new mixed oxygen ionic and electronic conducting (MIEC) materials, which have rapid surface exchange kinetics, high oxygen vacancy concentration, and extended TPB from the gas/electrode/electrolyte interface to the total external electrode surface area [6,7] . Recently, A 2 MO 4 oxides have received considerable attention in using as cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells due to their interesting mixed transport properties [8] . The A 2 MO 4 oxides, with M a transition metal cation like Ni and A, a lanthanide or alkaline earth, characterizes some oxygen over stoichiometry and a mixed valence of M in the compound [6] . The crystal structure of A 2 MO 4 oxides can be described as taking of perovskite layers alternating with NaCl (rock salt) layers. For a mixed oxygen–ionic and electronic conductor (MIEC) as the A 2 MO 4 oxide, the change of composition or oxidation–reduction treatments can greatly affect the transport properties, and the cathode reaction O 2 + 4e − = 2O 2 − occurs at the gas–MIEC two-phase interface, whereas it takes place only at a triple-phase boundary if the cathode is a pure electronic conductor [8,9] . In this way, several systems have been proposed either by doping at the A position with alkaline-earths and with other rare earths like Nd or Pr or by doping in the M position with other transition metals, typically Cu and Co, leading to dramatic changes of the structural and physical properties. Ishihara et al. reported that among different rare earth cations at the A-site, those incorporated Pr 3+ exhibit the highest electrical conductivity and the lowest overpotential values [10,11] . Therefore, a combination of Pr for A-site and Cu for M-site material Pr 2 Ni 1− x Cu x O 4 is expected to bring better electrochemical properties as a cathode material at intermediate temperature. Aguadero et al. investigated the electrochemical property of La 2 Ni 1− x Cu x O 4 materials and reported that among the La 2 Ni 1− x Cu x O 4 ( x = 0–1.0) system, the La 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 composition exhibits the highest electrical conductivity [8] . In this paper, Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 (PNCO) powders were synthesized by a glycine–nitrate methods. The microstructure and electrochemical property of the sintered PNCO material, including the electrical conductivity, the ohmic resistance and the electrode interfacial resistance were investigated, and single cells based on the PNCO cathode were also constructed and tested [12] . 2 Experimental 2.1 Sample preparation Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 powder was prepared by a glycine nitrate method using Pr 6 O 11 (AR), NiO (AR), CuO (AR) powders, HNO 3 (AR) and C 2 H 5 NO 2 (AR) as raw materials. Stoichiometry chemicals were dissolved into nitric acid to get a nitrate solution. Then glycine was added into the solution to form a transparent and homogeneous solution, which was subsequently heated and the viscosity of the solution increases gradually [13] . As temperature rises, a self-sustaining combustion finally occurs in the viscous gels and dark precursor powders were obtained. The precursor powders were then calcined at 1000 °C for 3 h to remove residue organics and form a stable crystalline structure. The calcined powders were subsequently pressed in a rigid die, and the compacts were then sintered at 900–1050 °C for 2 h for later test. Commercial NiO (2.5 μm) and Sm 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 1.9 (SCO, prepared by the gel-casting process, 30 nm) powders were employed to prepare the NiO/SCO anode substrates. After mechanically blending (NiO:SCO = 60:40 wt%), the powder mixes were compacted in a steel die with 18 mm in diameter, the green anode substrates were fired at 1000 °C for 2 h. SCO electrolyte slurry was prepared onto the fired NiO/SDC substrates by a dip-coating method. The coated samples were then co-sintered at 1400 °C for 4 h to obtain anode/electrolyte bilayer structure with dense SCO electrolyte film supported on porous NiO/SCO substrates. After screen-printing Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 slurry onto the electrolyte side of the NiO/SCO bilayer and subsequently sintering at 1050 °C for 2 h, single cells were obtained [14] . The active area of the cathode in the single cells was 0.24 cm 2 . Thickness of the anode, the cathode and the electrolyte in the single cell is about 1 mm, 100 μm and 30 μm, respectively. 2.2 Sample characterization Phase structure of the precursors and the calcined Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 powders were characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). Porosity of the PNCO samples sintered at different temperatures was tested using the Archimedes method with a theoretical density of Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 taken as 7.38 g cm −3 , which was calculated according data obtained from the XRD pattern. Microstructure of the PNCO samples sintered at different temperature was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Sirion 200). Electrical conductivity of the sintered PNCO samples was measured using the four-probe method. Single cell performance was tested using a house-made fuel cell testing device, with humidified hydrogen (3% H 2 O) as the fuel and steady air as the oxidant. Impendence spectra of the single cells were also tested using an electrochemical workstation (Chenhua 604A) under open-circuit conditions over a frequency range from 0.01 Hz to 1 MHz, with signal amplitude of 10 mV. The spectra were simulated by the Zsimpwin software. 3 Results and discussions 3.1 XRD analysis Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns of the precursors and the calcined Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 powders. There exist some peaks of miscellaneous phases in the XRD patterns of the precursor powders. This indicates that the chemicals did not react completely during the self-sustaining combustion. It can be seen from Fig. 1 that as the calcining temperature increases, miscellaneous phases reduce. And when calcining temperature increases to 1000 °C, only K 2 NiF 4 -type structure was observed in the XRD patterns. The samples retained the K 2 NiF 4 -type structure when the calcining temperature increases to 1100 °C. But the diffraction peaks become sharper and narrower than those of 1000 °C, which indicates grain growth of the calcined powders. According to the crystalline structure and the molecular formula of the PNCO powders, the grain parameters were calculated. The lattice content values are a = 5.456, b = 5.392, c = 12.446, α = 90°, β = 90°, γ = 90°. The grain size of the PNCO powders calcined at 1000 °C is 29.02 nm based on the Scherrer Formula. And the theoretical density of the PNCO powders is calculated to be 7.38 g cm −3 . 3.2 Porosity and microstructure of the sintered PNCO samples Table 1 lists relative density and open porosity of the Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 samples sintered at different temperature. As sintering temperature increases, the samples become dense. While the samples sintered at 900 °C have an open porosity of 51%, the samples sintered at 1100 °C only have an open porosity of 27%. Fig. 2 shows SEM microstructure of the PNCO samples sintered at different temperature. All of the sintered samples have porous structure. This porous structure can facilitate the diffusion of oxidant gases and extend the area of the triple-phase boundary (TPB). However, as the sintering temperature increases, the porosity of the PNCO samples deceases. This is consistent with the results listed in Table 1 . It can also be seen from Fig. 2 that the samples sintered at lower temperature have a smaller grain size. Average grain sizes of the PNCO samples sintered at 900 °C, 1000 °C, 1050 °C and 1100 °C is about 0.7, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.5 μm, respectively. 3.3 Electrical conductivity Electrical conductivity ( σ ) of the sintered Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 samples was measured in air by the four-probe method in the temperature range from 500 to 800 °C. Fig. 3 shows electrical conductivity as a function of testing temperature of the PNCO samples. As the sintering temperature of the PNCO samples increases, electrical conductivity increases gradually. A maximum conductivity of 130 S cm −1 was got for samples sintered at 1050 °C under testing temperature 500 °C. As sintering temperature increases, the samples become dense and the grain grows, which are beneficial to the transfer of ions and electrons, thus leading to the increase of electrical conduction. However, when the sintering temperature increases to 1100 °C, the conductivity of the sample becomes lower than that sintered at 1050 °C. This may be caused by the loss of surface area of grain boundaries, which results from the grain growth as sintering temperature. It can also be seen from Fig. 3 that conductivity of the PNCO samples decreases as measuring temperature increases, which indicates the electron conduction of the PNCO materials. Boehm et al. reported that La 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 material with K 2 NiF 4 -type structure has a conductivity of 87 S cm −1 at 580 °C [6] . This value is lower than the conductivity value of Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4+ δ obtained in this work (about 130 S cm −1 ). This may be caused by the different ionic of La 3+ (1.06 Å) with Pr 3+ (1.01 Å) and the additional contribution of the Pr 3+ /Pr 4+ valence change [11] . Average conduction activation energy was calculated from the ln σ and T −1 values, and the result is about 0.189, 0.137,0.110 and 0.114 eV for PNCO samples sintered at 900 °C, 1000 °C 1050 °C and 1100 °C for 2 h, respectively. The low-temperature sintered samples show slightly high resistant potential. This is consistent with the ionic conduction values. 3.4 Impedance spectra results Fig. 4 shows impedance spectra of the NiO–SCO/SCO/PNCO single cell at 800 °C in air. The high-frequency intercept with the real axis represents the ohmic losses, and the difference between the high frequency and low frequency intercepts denotes the total electrode interfacial resistances in the cell. The ASR value obtained in this work is the total electrode resistance. It includes the contribution of the anode and the cathode. Min Chen et al. have reported the ASR values of Ni/SDC electrodes [15] , which is about 0.12 Ω cm 2 for a Ni/SDC anode with 60% NiO. In this work we simply use this value as the anode ASR of the single cell we prepared, and because the total ASR value of the single cell tested is 0.19 Ω cm 2 , the cathode ASR value was calculated to be about 0.07 Ω cm 2 . It has been reported that the ASR value of the La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3 material is about 0.30 Ω cm 2 [16] . By comparison, ASR value of the PNCO material is much lower. The lower ASR value of the PNCO material makes it have high-electrocatalytic activity for oxygen-reduction reactions at intermediate temperatures. The excellent cathodic performance of the PNCO material can be ascribed to the fast oxygen diffusion in the bulk and the high surface kinetics on the surface of electrode. Moreover, as a MIEC oxide, PNCO provides multiple pathways for the oxygen ions to migrate to the electrode/electrolyte interface. 3.5 Single cell performance Fig. 5 shows the open circuit voltage (OCV) and power densities of a single solid oxide fuel cell with humidified hydrogen (3% H 2 O) as fuel and air as the oxidant in the temperature range of 500–800 °C. The single cell shows a maximum open circuit voltage of 0.82 V and 0.75 V at 700 °C and 800 °C, respectively. However, with increasing testing temperature, the OCV value deceases and is lower than the theoretical values. This may be due to the electronic penetration through SCO electrolyte. Maximum power densities of the cell were 238 and 308 mW cm −2 at 700 °C and 800 °C, respectively, indicating that good performance can be obtained for the single fuel cell using Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 as cathode and SCO film as electrolyte. It has mentioned above that the ASR value of Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 is lower than that of the La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3 material. Therefore, the cell based on Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 cathode shows a better performance than the traditional cathode La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3 [15] . Fig. 6 shows cross-section microstructure of the single cell after testing. There exists a good combination between the electrodes and the electrolyte. 4 Conclusions Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 (PNCO) powders with K 2 NiF 4 -type structure were successfully synthesized by a glycine–nitrate method. Sintered PNCO samples have porous structure and good electrical conductivity. A maximum electrical conductivity of 130 S cm −1 was obtained at 500 °C in air. There exist low ohmic resistance and electrode interfacial resistance of 0.08 Ω cm 2 and 0.19 Ω cm 2 , respectively. A single fuel cell based on the PNCO cathode with a 30 μm Sm 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 1.9 electrolyte and a 1 mm thickness NiO–SCO anode was constructed. The single cell shows an open circuit voltage of 0.82 V and 0.75 V and maximum power density of 238 mW cm −2 and 308 mW cm −2 at 700 °C and 800 °C, respectively. The present work has shown that the PNCO materials may be a favorable candidate for cathode material of intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (contract No. 070414186), the Program of Science and Technology of Anhui Province (contract No. 2008AKKG0332), the Nippon Sheet Glass Foundation for Materials Science and Engineering (NSCF) (contract No. 070304B2) and the Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Low Dimensinal Materials & Application Technology (Xiangtan University), Ministry of Education of China under contract No. DWKF0802. References [1] P. Bansal Narottam Z.M. Zhong J. Power Sources 158 2006 148 153 [2] C. Cacciola V. Antonucci S. Freni J. Power Sources 100 2001 67 79 [3] S.P. Jiang Y.M. Ye T.M. He S.B. Ho J. Power Sources 185 2006 1 [4] S. Yang T.M. He Q. He J. Alloys Compd. 450 2008 400 404 [5] Q.J. Zhou T.M. He Q. He Y. Ji Electrochem. Commun. 11 2009 80 83 [6] H. Zhao F. Mauvy C. Lalanne J.M. Bassat S. Fourcad J.C. Grenier Solid State Ionics 179 2008 35 36 [7] H.A. Hamedani K.H. Dahmen D. Li H. Peydaye-Saheli H. Garmestani M. Khaleel Mater. Sci. Eng. B: Adv. Funct. Solid-State Mater. 153 2008 1 3 [8] A. Aguadero J.A. Alonso M.J. Escudero L. Dazaet Solid State Ionics 179 2008 11 12 [9] J. Wan J.B. Goodenough J.H. Zhu Solid State Ionics 178 2007 281 286 [10] C.J. Zhu X.M. Liu D. Xu D.T. Yan D.Y. Wang W.H. Su Solid State Ionics 179 2008 1470 1473 [11] T. Ishihara T. Kudo H. Matsuda Y. Takita J. Electrochem. Soc. 142 1995 1519 1523 [12] Y. Tao H. Nishino S. Ashidate H. Kokubo M. Watanabe H. Uchida Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 3309 3315 [13] B. Yu W.Q. Zhang J.M. Xu J. Chen Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 6873 6877 [14] Tietz F. Haanappel V.A.C. Mai A. Mertens J. Stover J. Power Sources 156 2006 20 22 [15] J.D. Zhang Y. Ji H.B. Gao T.M. He J. Liu J. Alloys Compd. 395 2009 322 [16] E.P. Murray M.J. Sever S.A. Barnett Solid State Ionics 148 2002 27 34