Abstract:Species abundance distributions (SADs) are often used to verify mechanistic theories underlying community assembly. However, it is now accepted that SADs alone are not sufficient to reveal biological mechanisms. Recent attention focuses on the relative importance of stochastic dispersal processes versus deterministic processes such as interspecific competition and environmental filtering. Here, we combine a study of the commonness and rarity of species (i.e. the SAD) with mechanistic processes underlying community composition. By comparing the occurrence frequencies of each and every species with its abundance, we quantify the relative contributions of common and rare species to the maintenance of community structure. Essentially, we relate the continuum between commonness and rarity with that of niches and neutrality. An individual-based, spatially explicit model was used to simulate local communities in niche spaces with the same parameters. We generated sets of assemblages from which species were eliminated in opposing sequences: from common to rare and from rare to common, and investigated the relationship between the abundance and frequency of species. We tested the predictions of our model with empirical data from a field experiment in the environmentally homogeneous alpine meadows of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Our simulations support the widespread notion that common species maintain community structure, while rare species maintain species diversity, in both local and regional communities. Our results, both from theoretical simulations and from empirical observations, revealed positive correlations between the abundance of a particular species and its occurrence frequency. SAD curves describe a continuum between commonness and rarity. Removing species from the 'rare' end of this continuum has little effect on the similarity of communities, but removing species from the 'common' end of the continuum causes significant increases in beta diversity, or species turnover, between communities. In local communities distributed in a homogenous habitat, species located at the 'common' end of the continuum should be selected by environmental filtering, with niche space partitioning governed by interspecific competition. Conversely, species located at the 'rare' end of the continuum are most likely subject to stochastic dispersal processes. Species situated at intermediate locations on this continuum are therefore determined by niche and neutral processes acting together. Our results suggest that, in homogeneous habitats, SAD curves describing the common-rare continuum may also be used to describe the continuum between niches and neutrality.

Comparing Models of Species Abundance (Reply)

Density Dependence Explains Tree Species Abundance and Diversity in Tropical Forests.

Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages

Statistical mechanics of relative species abundance

Comment on the Ghost State in the Lee Model

Species Abundance Distributions As a Proxy for the Niche–neutrality Continuum

Species-area Relationships Explained by the Joint Effects of Dispersal Limitation and Habitat Heterogeneity.

Empirical Abundance Distributions Are More Uneven Than Expected Given Their Statistical Baseline

A mismatch between community assembly and abundance‐based diversity indices

Quantifying Factors for Understanding Why Several Small Patches Host More Species Than a Single Large Patch

Asymmetry In Species Regional Dispersal Ability And The Neutral Theory

Model Inadequacy and Mistaken Inferences of Trait-Dependent Speciation

Deriving a Neutral Model of Species Abundance from Fundamental Mechanisms of Population Dynamics

Spatial aggregation and the species-area relationship across scales

A review of statistical models used to characterize species-habitat associations with animal movement data

Why there are more species in several small patches versus few large patches: A multispecies modelling approach

Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence

A comparison of joint species distribution models for presence–absence data

Comparing Neutral and Trade-off Community Models in Shaping the Community Biomass-Diversity Relationship Under Different Disturbance Levels

A unifying model of species abundance distribution

Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects