Abstract:Species abundance distributions (SADs) are often used to verify mechanistic theories underlying community assembly. However, it is now accepted that SADs alone are not sufficient to reveal biological mechanisms. Recent attention focuses on the relative importance of stochastic dispersal processes versus deterministic processes such as interspecific competition and environmental filtering. Here, we combine a study of the commonness and rarity of species (i.e. the SAD) with mechanistic processes underlying community composition. By comparing the occurrence frequencies of each and every species with its abundance, we quantify the relative contributions of common and rare species to the maintenance of community structure. Essentially, we relate the continuum between commonness and rarity with that of niches and neutrality. An individual-based, spatially explicit model was used to simulate local communities in niche spaces with the same parameters. We generated sets of assemblages from which species were eliminated in opposing sequences: from common to rare and from rare to common, and investigated the relationship between the abundance and frequency of species. We tested the predictions of our model with empirical data from a field experiment in the environmentally homogeneous alpine meadows of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Our simulations support the widespread notion that common species maintain community structure, while rare species maintain species diversity, in both local and regional communities. Our results, both from theoretical simulations and from empirical observations, revealed positive correlations between the abundance of a particular species and its occurrence frequency. SAD curves describe a continuum between commonness and rarity. Removing species from the 'rare' end of this continuum has little effect on the similarity of communities, but removing species from the 'common' end of the continuum causes significant increases in beta diversity, or species turnover, between communities. In local communities distributed in a homogenous habitat, species located at the 'common' end of the continuum should be selected by environmental filtering, with niche space partitioning governed by interspecific competition. Conversely, species located at the 'rare' end of the continuum are most likely subject to stochastic dispersal processes. Species situated at intermediate locations on this continuum are therefore determined by niche and neutral processes acting together. Our results suggest that, in homogeneous habitats, SAD curves describing the common-rare continuum may also be used to describe the continuum between niches and neutrality.

Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages

Estimation of species richness: mixture models, the role of rare species, and inferential challenges

Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies

Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators

Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness

Effects of Sample Standardization on Mean Species Detectabilities and Estimates of Relative Differences in Species Richness among Assemblages

Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence‐based species accumulation curves

UVM ScholarWorks

A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Species Richness Estimation

Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages

Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation

A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data

Estimating regional species richness using a limited number of survey units

Abundance‐based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples

Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics

Comparing Models of Species Abundance (Reply)

A mismatch between community assembly and abundance‐based diversity indices

A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations

Ecological and biogeographic null hypotheses for comparing rarefaction curves

Species Abundance Distributions As a Proxy for the Niche–neutrality Continuum

On species richness and rarefaction: size- and coverage-based techniques quantify different characteristics of richness change in biodiversity