Abstract:Estimates of taxonomic richness and abundance are complicated by sampling biases. The failure to sample rare taxa is most often attributed to inadequate sampling and to removal during the process of sample-size standardization. Here I present two methods for unveiling rare diversity by integrating species presence/absence data from museum collections and the literature with quantitative estimates of species richness and abundance gathered from field-based bulk samples. Combining museum, literature, and field data can provide a more comprehensive estimate of taxonomic richness and abundance without substantial increase in current sampling effort. First, in a given bulk sample, the lowest proportional abundance value observed can be used to estimate the maximum abundance of rare species known to have occurred at the locality at least once but not recorded in the current sample. Second, a model-selection approach can be used, in which a set of relative abundance distribution models are fit to the bulk-sample abundance data and the parameter estimates for the best model used to calculate the abundance distribution for all species known from the locality. The Paleogene marine fossil record of the U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain is suitable for applying these methods, because (1) the molluscan fauna is well represented in museum collections and the literature, (2) the molluscan fauna has been taxonomically standardized, and (3) many classic localities remain accessible for standardized bulk sampling. I introduce these methods by applying them to a single locality and then, using the faunas of the Gosport, Moodys Branch, and Red Bluff Formations, I demonstrate how the model-fitting approach can be used to compare taxonomic richness among multiple localities. A substantial fraction of the molluscan richness known from each locality is not captured in bulk samples and much of this unobserved richness may be attributed to the rarity of species. The multiple-locality comparison suggests that the greatest Paleogene decline in standing richness occurred in the middle Eocene and that the recovery of richness following the Eocene-Oligocene extinction was quite rapid despite substantial loss of taxa. These analyses underscore the magnitude of veiled diversity in marine fossil assemblages and the potential of existing sources of data to unveil rare taxa, allowing them to be incorporated into quantitative diversity studies.

Estimation of species richness: mixture models, the role of rare species, and inferential challenges

A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Species Richness Estimation

Estimating the Number of Rare Species by Multisampling

Richness estimation with species identity error

Theory and application of an improved species richness estimator

Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies

Bayesian binomial mixture models for estimating abundance in ecological monitoring studies

Improving prediction of rare species’ distribution from community data

Species richness estimation with high diversity but spurious singletons

Estimating the number of species to attain sufficient representation in a random sample

rarestR: An R package using rarefaction metrics to estimate α-diversity (species richness) and β-diversity (species shared) for incomplete samples

Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics

Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance

Using camera traps and N‐mixture models to estimate population abundance: Model selection really matters

AbundanceR: A Novel Method for Estimating Wildlife Abundance Based on Distance Sampling and Species Distribution Models

PRECISION AND BIAS OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POINT SURVEY DETECTION PROBABILITIES

Unveiling rare diversity by integrating museum, literature, and field data

Prospective sampling based on model ensembles improves the detection of rare species

A mismatch between community assembly and abundance‐based diversity indices

Robust estimation of microbial diversity in theory and in practice

Estimating diversity via frequency ratios