Abstract:Seminal ecological theories, island biogeography and the single large or several small (SLOSS) reserve debate, examine whether large contiguous habitats conserve biodiversity better than multiple smaller patches. Today, delineating the ecological effects of habitat area versus configuration in a fragmentation context remains difficult, and often confounds efforts to understand proximate and ultimate drivers of community change in response to habitat alteration. We examined how the major components of fragmentation, habitat division versus area loss, independently influence faunal communities using landscapes constructed from artificial seagrass at scales relevant for juvenile estuarine nekton. We deployed 25 unique, 234‐m2 landscapes designed along orthogonal axes: habitat percent cover (i.e., area) and fragmentation per se (i.e., patchiness) to examine their effects on faunal density, community composition, and probability of bait‐assay consumption. Faunal sampling occurred in both artificial seagrass and interspaced sandflat matrix. We also examined whether larval‐settler density drove faunal density patterns across landscapes. Further, we assessed the relative importance of landscape‐scale parameters versus fine‐scale complexity–canopy height and epiphyte biomass–in determining faunal densities. We most consistently observed increasing epibenthic fish and macroinvertebrate density with increasing seagrass percent cover. Fragmentation per se only negatively affected epibenthic faunal density within the matrix at low seagrass coverage. Bait consumption increased with seagrass cover, suggesting larger habitats are relative foraging hotspots. Alternatively, benthopelagic fish density was unaffected by habitat parameters, reflecting lower seagrass reliance, or increased matrix tolerance. Community compositions did not vary across landscapes, suggesting that abundant species used landscapes indiscriminately. Finally, the relative importance of habitat parameters shifted across faunal guilds and life stages. Landscape percent cover most affected epibenthic faunal density, but not benthopelagic fish density, and neither pattern was related to settler density. Further, only fine‐scale complexity influenced settler densities. Collectively, our results indicate habitat area is a primary, positive driver of faunal densities and generalist consumption, and therefore should be prioritized in seagrass conservation. However, sampling across spatial scales and habitat types revealed nuances in habitat use patterns among faunal guilds and life stages that were not solely area‐dependent, illustrating that a variety of landscape configurations support essential nursery functions.

Quantifying Factors for Understanding Why Several Small Patches Host More Species Than a Single Large Patch

Why there are more species in several small patches versus few large patches: A multispecies modelling approach

A Landscape‐level Analysis of Bird Taxonomic, Functional and Phylogenetic Β‐diversity in Habitat Island Systems

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

SLOSS‐based Inferences in a Fragmented Landscape Depend on Fragment Area and Species–area Slope

Habitat Fragmentation Affects Richness—A View Through a Metacommunity Lens

The Asymmetric Relationships of the Distribution of Conspecific Saplings and Adults in Forest Fragments

Assessing Habitat Fragmentation’s Hierarchical Effects on Species Diversity at Multiple Scales: the Case of Thousand Island Lake, China

Patterns of Avian Diversity Across a Decreasing Patch‐size Gradient in a Critically Endangered Subtropical Forest System

BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: Nestedness for Different Reasons: the Distributions of Birds, Lizards and Small Mammals on Islands of an Inundated Lake

Quantifying Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Other Clustering Processes on Spatial Distributions of Tree Species

Species-area Relationships Explained by the Joint Effects of Dispersal Limitation and Habitat Heterogeneity.

Habitat amount, not patch size and isolation, drives species richness of macro‐moth communities in countryside landscapes

Beta Diversity Among Ant Communities On Fragmented Habitat Islands: The Roles Of Species Trait, Phylogeny And Abundance

Functional and phylogenetic structure of island bird communities

Revealing Beta-Diversity Patterns Of Breeding Bird And Lizard Communities On Inundated Land-Bridge Islands By Separating The Turnover And Nestedness Components

Selective Extinction Drives Taxonomic and Functional Alpha and Beta Diversities in Island Bird Assemblages.

Habitat area more consistently affects seagrass faunal communities than fragmentation per se

Patterns of Bird Functional Diversity on Land-Bridge Island Fragments

High Beta Diversity among Small Islands is Due to Environmental Heterogeneity Rather Than Ecological Drift

Distinguishing Effects of Area Per Se and Isolation from the Sample‐area Effect for True Islands and Habitat Fragments