Abstract:The CIELAB lightness and chroma values of pixels in five of the eight ISO SCID natural images were modified to produce sample images. Pairs of images were displayed on a calibrated monitor and assessed by a panel of 12 observers with normal color vision using a categorical judgment method. The experimental results showed that assuming the lightness parametric factor k(L)=1 to predict color differences in images, CIELAB performed better than CIEDE2000, CIE94, or CMC, which is a different result to the one found in color-difference literature for homogeneous color pairs. However, observers perceived CIELAB lightness and chroma differences in images in different ways. To fit current experimental data, a specific methodology is proposed to optimize k(L) in the color-difference formulas CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CIE94, and CMC. From the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index, it was found that the optimized formulas, CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1), performed significantly better than their corresponding original forms with lightness parametric factor k(L)=1. Specifically, CIEDE2000(2.3:1) performed the best, with a satisfactory average STRESS value of 25.8, which is very similar to the 27.5 value that was found from the CIEDE2000(1:1) formula for the combined weighted dataset of homogeneous color samples employed at the development of this formula [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1828 (2008), Table 2]. However, fitting our experimental data, none of the four optimized formulas CIELAB(1.5:1), CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1) is significantly better than the others. Current results roughly agree with the recent CIE recommendation that color difference in images can be predicted by simply adopting a lightness parametric factor k(L)=2 in CIELAB or CIEDE2000 [CIE Publication 199:2011]. It was also found that the different contents of the five images have considerable influence on the performance of the tested color-difference formulas.

Specification For The Chromaticity Of White And Coloured Light Sources

A Revisit of the MacAdam Colour Discrimination Ellipses

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Printed Samples.

Reliability of MacAdam Color Discrimination Ellipses

Colour difference evaluation using display colours

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Colour Differences of a Wide Colour Gamut

Chromaticity-Discrimination Ellipses For Surface Colors

Colour‐difference Evaluation Using CRT Colours. Part I: Data Gathering and Testing Colour Difference Formulae

Development of a Uniform Colour Space for Evaluating Colour Differences Under HDR Viewing Conditions

The Llab Model For Colour Appearance And Colour Difference Evaluation

Evaluation of Threshold Color Differences Using Printed Samples.

Quantifying Colour Appearance. Part I. Lutchi Colour Appearance Data

Assessing Colour Differences under a Wide Range of Luminance Levels Using Surface and Display Colours

Evaluation of Colour-difference Formulae for Different Colour-difference Magnitudes

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

A Colour-Difference Formula for Assessing Large Colour Differences

An Investigation of Colour Appearance for Unrelated Colours under Photopic and Mesopic Vision

Evaluation Of Colour Fidelity Based Colour Rendering Indices

A Parametric Colour-difference Study on the Separation and CMF Effects.

Uniform Colour Spaces Based on CIECAM02 Colour Appearance Model