Abstract:CIE has recently recommended a new color appearance model CIECAM16 to replace CIECAM02. It was also intended to recommend a uniform color space (UCS) based on CIECAM16, CIECAM16-UCS, for predicting color difference. However, there was a debate as to whether CIECAM16 can be used to predict color difference, since it takes tristimulus values calculated using the CIE 2 degrees observer as input, while tristimulus values for color difference are usually calculated using the CIE 10 degrees observer, as in the CIEDE2000 formula. Thus, further evidence is needed before CAM16-UCS can be recommended by the CIE as uniform color space. In this paper, we investigate the likely difference in color difference prediction when using CAM16-UCS, and its potential statistical significance. Firstly, the reflectance of each pair of color samples in the visual color difference datasets: BFD-P, Leeds, RIT-DuPont and Witt was generated based on the given tristimulus values. Then, color difference AE2,F and AE10,F, with F being the CAM16-UCS, can be computed under any illuminant using the 2 degrees and 10 degrees observers respectively. Comparison results showed that the difference between AE2,F and AE10,F was not statistically significant. Finally, both AE2,F and AE10,F were used to predict the visual color difference DV and the STRESS values between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV respectively. Statistical tests showed that the differences between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV were not significant. Hence this study shows that CAM16-UCS can be reliably used for predicting color difference. The findings are valuable for CIE to recommend CAM16-UCS as a uniform color space. Currently CIE TC1-98 is investigating the establishment of a new colorimetric system based on cone response tristimulus values LMS. It is expected that the reflectance datasets generated from the color difference datasets will be useful for the evaluation of any new colorimetric system.(c) 2023 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.

A Revisit of the MacAdam Colour Discrimination Ellipses

Reliability of MacAdam Color Discrimination Ellipses

Colour difference evaluation using display colours

Specification For The Chromaticity Of White And Coloured Light Sources

Chromaticity-Discrimination Ellipses For Surface Colors

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Assessing Colour Differences under a Wide Range of Luminance Levels Using Surface and Display Colours

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Colour Differences of a Wide Colour Gamut

Checking Recent Colour-Difference Formulas with a Dataset of Metallic Samples and Just Noticeable Colour-Difference Assessments.

Evaluation of Threshold Color Differences Using Printed Samples.

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Colour‐difference Evaluation Using CRT Colours. Part I: Data Gathering and Testing Colour Difference Formulae

Study of Color Discrimination Threshold Using CRT Display. Part Ⅱ : Evaluation of Classical Color-Difference Formulae

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Printed Samples.

A Comprehensive Test of Colour‐difference Formulae and Uniform Colour Spaces Using Available Visual Datasets

Evaluation of Colour-difference Formulae for Different Colour-difference Magnitudes

A Colour-Difference Formula for Assessing Large Colour Differences

A Parametric Colour-difference Study on the Separation and CMF Effects.

Investigation of Parametric Colour Difference on Physical Size Effect for Sample Pairs with Separation

Evaluation of Performance of Twelve Color-Difference Formulae Using Two NCSU Experimental Datasets.

Evaluation of Color Difference Prediction with CIECAM16 Using CIE 2-and 10-Degree Observers