Abstract:The CIELAB lightness and chroma values of pixels in five of the eight ISO SCID natural images were modified to produce sample images. Pairs of images were displayed on a calibrated monitor and assessed by a panel of 12 observers with normal color vision using a categorical judgment method. The experimental results showed that assuming the lightness parametric factor k(L)=1 to predict color differences in images, CIELAB performed better than CIEDE2000, CIE94, or CMC, which is a different result to the one found in color-difference literature for homogeneous color pairs. However, observers perceived CIELAB lightness and chroma differences in images in different ways. To fit current experimental data, a specific methodology is proposed to optimize k(L) in the color-difference formulas CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CIE94, and CMC. From the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index, it was found that the optimized formulas, CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1), performed significantly better than their corresponding original forms with lightness parametric factor k(L)=1. Specifically, CIEDE2000(2.3:1) performed the best, with a satisfactory average STRESS value of 25.8, which is very similar to the 27.5 value that was found from the CIEDE2000(1:1) formula for the combined weighted dataset of homogeneous color samples employed at the development of this formula [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1828 (2008), Table 2]. However, fitting our experimental data, none of the four optimized formulas CIELAB(1.5:1), CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1) is significantly better than the others. Current results roughly agree with the recent CIE recommendation that color difference in images can be predicted by simply adopting a lightness parametric factor k(L)=2 in CIELAB or CIEDE2000 [CIE Publication 199:2011]. It was also found that the different contents of the five images have considerable influence on the performance of the tested color-difference formulas.

A Parametric Colour-difference Study on the Separation and CMF Effects.

Parametric Effects in Color-Difference Evaluation

Investigation of Parametric Colour Difference on Physical Size Effect for Sample Pairs with Separation

A Parametric Colour Difference Equation to Evaluate Colour Difference Magnitude Effect for Gapless Printed Stimuli

Investigation of Parametric Effects Using Small Colour Differences

Investigation of Parametric Effects Using Medium Colour‐difference Pairs

Effect of Printed Color Sample Separation and Color-Difference Magnitude on Perceived Color Difference

Investigation of texture effect on visual colour difference evaluation

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Printed Samples.

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Colour Differences of a Wide Colour Gamut

Color-difference Formula for Evaluating Color Pairs with No Separation: ΔENS.

Evaluation of Colour-difference Formulae for Different Colour-difference Magnitudes

A Comprehensive Test of Colour‐difference Formulae and Uniform Colour Spaces Using Available Visual Datasets

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Assessing colour differences with different magnitudes

Colour‐difference Evaluation Using CRT Colours. Part I: Data Gathering and Testing Colour Difference Formulae

Colour difference evaluation using display colours

A color-difference formula for evaluating color pairs with no separation -- $ΔE_{NS}$

The Prediction of Perceived Colour Differences by Colour Fidelity Metrics

Evaluation of Performance of Twelve Color-Difference Formulae Using Two NCSU Experimental Datasets.