Abstract:CIE has recently recommended a new color appearance model CIECAM16 to replace CIECAM02. It was also intended to recommend a uniform color space (UCS) based on CIECAM16, CIECAM16-UCS, for predicting color difference. However, there was a debate as to whether CIECAM16 can be used to predict color difference, since it takes tristimulus values calculated using the CIE 2 degrees observer as input, while tristimulus values for color difference are usually calculated using the CIE 10 degrees observer, as in the CIEDE2000 formula. Thus, further evidence is needed before CAM16-UCS can be recommended by the CIE as uniform color space. In this paper, we investigate the likely difference in color difference prediction when using CAM16-UCS, and its potential statistical significance. Firstly, the reflectance of each pair of color samples in the visual color difference datasets: BFD-P, Leeds, RIT-DuPont and Witt was generated based on the given tristimulus values. Then, color difference AE2,F and AE10,F, with F being the CAM16-UCS, can be computed under any illuminant using the 2 degrees and 10 degrees observers respectively. Comparison results showed that the difference between AE2,F and AE10,F was not statistically significant. Finally, both AE2,F and AE10,F were used to predict the visual color difference DV and the STRESS values between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV respectively. Statistical tests showed that the differences between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV were not significant. Hence this study shows that CAM16-UCS can be reliably used for predicting color difference. The findings are valuable for CIE to recommend CAM16-UCS as a uniform color space. Currently CIE TC1-98 is investigating the establishment of a new colorimetric system based on cone response tristimulus values LMS. It is expected that the reflectance datasets generated from the color difference datasets will be useful for the evaluation of any new colorimetric system.(c) 2023 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.

Evaluation of Threshold Color Differences Using Printed Samples.

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Printed Samples.

Research on large color difference evaluation using printed samples

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Perceptual Color-Difference Thresholds for Images under Different Viewing Conditions

Effect of Printed Color Sample Separation and Color-Difference Magnitude on Perceived Color Difference

Evaluation of Colour-difference Formulae for Different Colour-difference Magnitudes

Colorimetric Characterization of Scanner by Measures of Perceptual Color Error.

Study of Color Discrimination Threshold Using CRT Display. Part Ⅱ : Evaluation of Classical Color-Difference Formulae

Investigation of texture effect on visual colour difference evaluation

Evaluation of Performance of Twelve Color-Difference Formulae Using Two NCSU Experimental Datasets.

A Parametric Colour Difference Equation to Evaluate Colour Difference Magnitude Effect for Gapless Printed Stimuli

Methods of Scaling Threshold Color Difference Using Printed Samples

Investigations of Suprathreshold Color-Difference Tolerances with Different Visual Scales and Different Perceptual Correlates Using CRT Colors

Checking Recent Colour-Difference Formulas with a Dataset of Metallic Samples and Just Noticeable Colour-Difference Assessments.

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Parametric Effects in Color-Difference Evaluation

Evaluation of Small Suprathreshold Color Differences under Different Background Colors

Evaluation of Very Large Colour Difference Based on Object Surface Colours

Evaluation of Color Difference Prediction with CIECAM16 Using CIE 2-and 10-Degree Observers

A Comprehensive Test of Colour‐difference Formulae and Uniform Colour Spaces Using Available Visual Datasets