Inspection of defects in composite structures using long pulse thermography and shearography
Yanjie Wei,Yao Xiao,Xiaohui Gu,Jianying Ren,Yu Zhang,Dongsheng Zhang,Yanhong Chen,Haiyan Li,Shaohua Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33184
IF: 3.776
2024-06-17
Heliyon
Abstract:Long pulse thermography (LPT) and shearography have been developed as primary methods for detecting debonding or delamination defects in composites due to their full-field imaging, non-contact operation, and high detection efficiency. Both methods utilize halogen lamps as the excitation source for thermal loading. However, the defects detected by the two techniques differ due to their distinct inspection mechanisms. In this study, LPT and shearography are employed to evaluate internal damage in various composite structures. The experimental results demonstrate that LPT, when combined with thermal signal processing algorithms, can clearly detect debonding defects in rubber-to-metal bonded plates, whereas excessive adhesive defects can only be identified by shearography. Flat-bottom holes in the CFRP panel can only be detected by LPT, and shearography is particularly effective for detecting composite materials with a metal skin. For the quantitative measurement of defect sizes, the average errors of the rubber-to-metal bonded plate and CFRP panel using LPT are 4.9 % and 2.2 %, respectively, whereas the average errors of the rubber-to-metal bonded plate and aluminum honeycomb panel using shearography are 15.12 % and 95.4 %, respectively. This indicates that LPT is superior to shearography in quantitatively measuring defect sizes. These two nondestructive testing methods, based on different principles, each have their own advantages and disadvantages. Employing a multi-modal inspection method can leverage their complementary advantages, preventing misdetection and leakage of internal defects in composites.