Influence of Ni Precursors on the Structure, Performance, and Carbon Deposition of Ni-Al2O3 Catalysts for CO Methanation

Wenlong Mo,Xingxiang Wang,Meng Zou,Xianjin Huang,Fengyun Ma,Jianzhang Zhao,Tiansheng Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00914
IF: 4.1
2021-01-01
ACS Omega
Abstract:Three Ni-Al2O3 catalysts were prepared, in planetary ball-milling machine, by the mechanochemical method with Al(NO3)(3)center dot 9H(2)O as the aluminum precursor, (NH4)(2)CO3 as the precipitant, and Ni(NO3)(2)center dot 6H(2)O, NiCl2 center dot 6H(2)O, and Ni(CH3COO)(2)center dot 4H(2)O as nickel precursors (the corresponding catalysts were labeled as Ni-NO, Ni-Cl, and Ni-Ac). The prepared catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature-programmed reduction (H-2-TPR), and N-2 adsorption-desorption technologies, and CO methanation performance evaluation was carried out for the catalysts. Results showed that the catalyst with Ni(NO3)(2)center dot 6H(2)O as the precursor presented good Ni dispersibility and a small Ni grain size of 6.80 nm. CO conversion, CH4 selectivity, and yield of the catalyst were as high as 78.8, 87.9, and 69.8%, respectively. Carbon deposition analysis from temperature-programmed hydrogenation (TPH) characterization showed that the H-2 consumption peak area of the three samples followed the order: Ni-NO (2886.66 au) < Ni-Cl (4389.97 au) < Ni-Ac (5721.65 au), indicating that the Ni-NO catalyst showed higher resistance to carbon deposition, which might be due to its small Ni grain size.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?