Abstract:In the instant case between China and Japan in the East China Sea, right or title to continental shelf is the central issue of dispute. The law on continental shelf has evolved, from the natural prolongation principle confirmed in North Sea Continental Shelf Case in 1969, to a rule more favorably considering "distance criterion". Therefore, it is necessary to take the time factor into account. Time factor can be approached from three perspectives, that is, critical date, inter-temporal law and contemporary law. Critical date is the date when the dispute was given rise to with a concrete issue. Inter-temporal law should be considered when legal relationship had been constructed before the change of the law, and contemporary law applies only when legal relationship was constructed after the change of the law. The mere fact that Sino-Japanese dispute over East China Sea has long before emerged indicates that the time factor in the dispute is not simply a contemporary law question as Japan asserts. The critical date in this dispute can be dated back to 1974 when China protested the Japanese-South Korean continental shelf agreement. If so, the changes in the law and fact after 1974 would be excluded and the applicable law should be the principle of natural prolongation. Moreover, if the critical date is deemed to be the year of 1996, when conflicting claims on the legal basis on continental shelf became distinct, inter-temporal law needs to be discussed. In such a case, if the change in law (incorporating distance criterion) is merely a treaty rule of UNCLOS, non-retroactivity principle in the law of treaties would neatly determine the application of natural prolongation principle established in previous law. In case that the change in law is an alleged customary rule emerged around the year of 1982, were this subsequent law applied, a reasonable long period of time from the previous law would have been required. It is impossible in the present case to draw a conclusion that the evolution of the law on continental shelf over just twelve years (1969-1982) could be reasonably taken as a long period of time. Therefore, even critical date were to be set in the year of 1996, the applicable law is still natural prolongation principle.

Literature and Arguments concerning Continental Shelf Delimitation in Japanese International Law Academia

The Significance of Natural Prolongation Principle in the East China Sea Dispute between China and Japan——Perspective from the Relationship between Institution of Right and Rule of Delimitation

Development Of Maritime Limitation Of Liability In China (1993-2011)

Revisiting the ICJ’s 1985 Libya/Malta case and the Primacy of the Distance Criterion under the Continental Shelf Regime: Implications and Prospects for the 1974 Korea-Japan Joint Development Agreement and the East China Sea

Research on a Typical Case of International Maritime Delimitation

Analysis and Selection of the Proposals on the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary of the East China Sea Between China and Japan

Effect of Natural Prolongation with Geological Features on Maritime Delimitation

Time Factor in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over East China Sea: the Critical Date and Inter-temporal Law

Principles and methods for the submission consideration of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf —— Cases study of recommendations summary made by the Commission

Assessing the Impact of Sea Level Rise on Maritime Entitlement and Delimitation: an Interdisciplinary Investigation Through Legal and Technical Analysis

Technologies and Their Application for the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles

Analysis of the Jurisprudence of Article 58 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Positions of West African Countries

Quantitative Analysis for Maritime Delimitation: Reassessing the Bay of Bengal Delimitation Between Bangladesh and Myanmar

Preliminary Considerations on the Potential Influence of Submarine Fans on Marine Delimitation

International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation

International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation: an Alternative for East Asia?

New developments and trends in extended continental shelf delineation practices-An analysis of China's participation and response strategies

Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the Settlement of Marine Environmental Disputes under UNCLOS

Discoursing Chinese Maritime Law’s Structure and Reform

The International Law Problems on Opening Up the Oil and Gas Resources in East China Sea:Japan's Trend and China's Countermove

The Development of International Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals