Abstract:This article considers the theory of the primacy of the distance criterion over the natural prolongation under the continental shelf regime, which was resulted from the 1985 judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Libya/Malta case. In addition, an effort is made to suggest the influence on the Japan’s position as to the continental shelf in the East China Sea, including the issue of the 1974 Korea-Japan Joint Development Agreement (JDA), and further, draw implications for Korea and prospects in the East China Sea. The doctrine of the natural prolongation of the land territory suggested in the ICJ’s judgment in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases enabled Korea to conclude the JDA with Japan. However, shortly after, the introduction of the exclusive economic zone regime based on the distance criterion made the natural prolongation doctrine lose its power. Particularly, in the 1985 Libya/Malta case, the ICJ presented a ruling that could be misread as meaning that a State’s natural prolongation entitlement to a continental shelf beyond 200 NM cannot extend within 200 NM of another State. This judgment is presumed to have had some impact on Japan’s passive attitude toward the implementation of the JDA. Japan has taken the position that Korea’s continental shelf claim beyond 200 NM cannot be recognized legally in the East China Sea. However, this theory seems to be very doubtful because it ignores the natural prolongation entitlement without grounds. There was no subsequent case law that explicitly acknowledged the theory. In the ICJ’s pending case concerning the Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 NM from the Nicaraguan Coast, the ICJ is addressing this issue now. In order to prepare for the future of the East China Sea, it is necessary to understand Japan’s relevant legal position and its basis. Moreover, particular attention should be paid to the forthcoming judgment in the abovementioned Nicaragua v. Colombia case.

Research on a Typical Case of International Maritime Delimitation

The 2022 ICJ Judgment in Nicaragua V. Colombia: Towards a Theory of Exclusivity in Allocating Rights and Jurisdiction Between the Coastal and Other States?

Literature and Arguments concerning Continental Shelf Delimitation in Japanese International Law Academia

Development Of Maritime Limitation Of Liability In China (1993-2011)

Effect of Natural Prolongation with Geological Features on Maritime Delimitation

International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation

Why International Conciliation Can Resolve Maritime Disputes: A Study Based on the Jan Mayen Case

Revisiting the ICJ’s 1985 Libya/Malta case and the Primacy of the Distance Criterion under the Continental Shelf Regime: Implications and Prospects for the 1974 Korea-Japan Joint Development Agreement and the East China Sea

The Development of International Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals

Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the Settlement of Marine Environmental Disputes under UNCLOS

Analysis of the Jurisprudence of Article 58 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Positions of West African Countries

Ghana v. Ivory Coast

Assessing the Impact of Sea Level Rise on Maritime Entitlement and Delimitation: an Interdisciplinary Investigation Through Legal and Technical Analysis

The Significance of Natural Prolongation Principle in the East China Sea Dispute between China and Japan——Perspective from the Relationship between Institution of Right and Rule of Delimitation

International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation: an Alternative for East Asia?

Analysis and Selection of the Proposals on the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary of the East China Sea Between China and Japan

Quantitative Analysis for Maritime Delimitation: Reassessing the Bay of Bengal Delimitation Between Bangladesh and Myanmar

Consideration on the Fishery Disputes in the Exclusive Economic Zone Related with China and Its Settlement Approach

Mixed Disputes and the Jurisdictional Puzzle in Two Pending Cases: Mauritius V. U.K. and the Philippines V. China

The Legal Regime of Straits: Contemporary Challenges and Solutions. By Hugo Caminos & Vincent P. Cogliati-Bantz.

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment: Taking Stock and Prospects