Abstract:In the instant case between China and Japan in the East China Sea, right or title to continental shelf is the central issue of dispute. The law on continental shelf has evolved, from the natural prolongation principle confirmed in North Sea Continental Shelf Case in 1969, to a rule more favorably considering "distance criterion". Therefore, it is necessary to take the time factor into account. Time factor can be approached from three perspectives, that is, critical date, inter-temporal law and contemporary law. Critical date is the date when the dispute was given rise to with a concrete issue. Inter-temporal law should be considered when legal relationship had been constructed before the change of the law, and contemporary law applies only when legal relationship was constructed after the change of the law. The mere fact that Sino-Japanese dispute over East China Sea has long before emerged indicates that the time factor in the dispute is not simply a contemporary law question as Japan asserts. The critical date in this dispute can be dated back to 1974 when China protested the Japanese-South Korean continental shelf agreement. If so, the changes in the law and fact after 1974 would be excluded and the applicable law should be the principle of natural prolongation. Moreover, if the critical date is deemed to be the year of 1996, when conflicting claims on the legal basis on continental shelf became distinct, inter-temporal law needs to be discussed. In such a case, if the change in law (incorporating distance criterion) is merely a treaty rule of UNCLOS, non-retroactivity principle in the law of treaties would neatly determine the application of natural prolongation principle established in previous law. In case that the change in law is an alleged customary rule emerged around the year of 1982, were this subsequent law applied, a reasonable long period of time from the previous law would have been required. It is impossible in the present case to draw a conclusion that the evolution of the law on continental shelf over just twelve years (1969-1982) could be reasonably taken as a long period of time. Therefore, even critical date were to be set in the year of 1996, the applicable law is still natural prolongation principle.

The International Law Problems on Opening Up the Oil and Gas Resources in East China Sea:Japan's Trend and China's Countermove

Legal System of Compensation for Marine Oil Pollution in China

FOCUS ON CHINA : JURISDICTIONAL CLAIMS, CURRENT PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT

Analysis and Selection of the Proposals on the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary of the East China Sea Between China and Japan

Time Factor in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over East China Sea: the Critical Date and Inter-temporal Law

The East China Sea: A Case of Ocean Geopolitics and Maritime Conflict

The East Sea Oil Co-operation Between China and Japan and Their Compact on "East Asia Energy Community"

New developments and trends in extended continental shelf delineation practices-An analysis of China's participation and response strategies

The Significance of Natural Prolongation Principle in the East China Sea Dispute between China and Japan——Perspective from the Relationship between Institution of Right and Rule of Delimitation

SEAPOWER AND SINO-JAPANESE RELATIONS IN THE EAST CHINA SEA

Senkaku/Diaoyu: Are They Islands?

Literature and Arguments concerning Continental Shelf Delimitation in Japanese International Law Academia

Why The 2008 Sino-Japanese Consensus On The East China Sea Has Stalled: Good Faith And Reciprocity Considerations In Interim Measures Pending A Maritime Boundary Delimitation

Consideration on the Fishery Disputes in the Exclusive Economic Zone Related with China and Its Settlement Approach

China’s Strategic Options at Tapping the World’s Crude Oil Resources

Revisiting the ICJ’s 1985 Libya/Malta case and the Primacy of the Distance Criterion under the Continental Shelf Regime: Implications and Prospects for the 1974 Korea-Japan Joint Development Agreement and the East China Sea

Comparing China'S Claims and Policies in the East and South China Seas: Implications for Regional Security

Gulf of Tonkin Demarcation Negotiations and their Implications for Remaining Maritime Disputes

The Sino-Japanese relations in light of the dispute over the East China Sea

China’s Law Diplomacy——Theory and Practice

The Legal Issues and Countermeasures of Overseas Resource Investment