Autonomy of International Sports Organization:Under the Background of Olympic Good-Governance Reform

Lu HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2016.01.002
2016-01-01
Abstract:As the frontier of the international-sports study, the organization-autonomy study is a pressing problem faced by the reform and development of Chinese sports organizations. The autonomy of international sports organization has profound democratic traditions and its unique advantages;however, vari?ous disadvantages caused by the independent centralization are also apparent. It is necessary to establish and improve the internal control mechanism inside the organization in order to ensure a maximum efficiency and to avoid the consequences of bad governance. As a way of internal decision-making and inter?est-negotiating, good governance is the best mechanism for internally controlling the autonomy and organizing efficient operations inside the international sports organization. In-depth interpretation of the contents and the environmental background for supporting the autonomy proposed in the 28th Article of Olympic Agenda 2020, discussion about the relationship between the organizational autonomy and the good-governance reform as well as the close connection between the autonomy and the organizational efficiency shall be convenient for the faster and better responses to the problems faced by the organization and the stakeholders. The reform agenda with regard to the good governance and autonomy defined at the Olympic Agenda 2020 shall be conducted from three per?spectives, including the standards of good governance, autonomy and transparency, and possesses certain quality policy standard and reform foresight. Howev?er, the policy design for the reform of Olympic good governance is restricted, and the policy-implementing practice is confronted with many difficulties, and a series of problems exist in the internal control mechanism of the Olympic movement, for which the future of good-governance reform is unknown. It is not on?ly a naturally successful process of political identification, but also a continuous process of cooperation and enhancement in political inter-trust among power bodies, from the achievement of good governance in the internal organization-control to the seeking of political identification and autonomy. The International Olympic Committee shall be committed to reform and practice of the good governance, instead of seeking political autonomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?