Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

The Legalization and Improvement of Significant Administrative Decision-making Process

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

From Stakeholder Participation to Interests-balancing and Reason-explaining:The Direction of Major Administrative Decision-making Procedure Legalization on the Allocation of Public Resources

Analysis And Formulation: Reflections On Rule Of Law Of Chinese Administrative Decision-Making Consultation System

On the Legal Regulation of Environmental Administrative Decision-making

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

Reflection on Rationalization of Public Decision-making from the Perspective of the Administrative Law

Legal Regulation of Public Administrative Organization

On Ultra Vires in Administrative Regulations

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Sound Governance in Administrative Legislation

The Analysis of the Untoward Circumstances and Routes of Administrative Policy-Making by Legal System in China

Administrative Procedure Law: the Basic Law Regulating Administrative Power

On the Modification of The Administrative Procedure Law and the Concept of Administration Under Rule of Law

The Function Allocating of Administrative Discretion Standard’s Making

On the Improvement of the Subject of the Administrative Legislation Assessment System in China

Several Major Issues in Amendment to Administrative Reconsideration Law

On the Expansion of Procedures As Administrative Legitimacy——Reflections on Hunan Provincial Regulations for Procedures of Administration

The Standards and Methods of Judicial Review:From the Perspective of American Administrative Law

On the Perfection and Development of the System of Administrative Litigation--the Conception of Revising the Administrative Procedure Law