Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

On Ultra Vires in Administrative Regulations

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On the Constitution Normative Foundation of the Legitimacy of Administrative Procedure

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

Administrative Self-regulation and Rule of Administrative Law:A Preliminary Invest

Sound Governance in Administrative Legislation

The Analysis of the Untoward Circumstances and Routes of Administrative Policy-Making by Legal System in China

On the Constitutional Foundation of Administrative Law

The Standards and Methods of Judicial Review:From the Perspective of American Administrative Law

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

The Status Quo, Problems and Construction of the System of Administrative Action Null and Void in China

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Constitutional Provisions Concerning Administrative Division: from the Angle of "county Directly under the Provisional Government"

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

Authority of Normative Document and Levels of Judicial Review

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)