Abstract:Here, we investigate the sensitivity of close‐kin mark‐recapture (CKMR) models to violations of underlying assumptions, and then propose and test modified approaches that correct the bias. We find that base‐case CKMR models are sensitive to unmodeled population dynamics and measurement error including interannual fluctuations in population size, intermittent breeding dynamics, and aging error. We then present adapted models that account for the hidden population dynamics, and – using both simulation and real genetic data – show that targeted sampling of juveniles that can be reliably aged can eliminate the bias that arises from errors in aging. Obtaining robust estimates of population abundance is a central challenge hindering the conservation and management of many threatened and exploited species. Close‐kin mark‐recapture (CKMR) is a genetics‐based approach that has strong potential to improve the monitoring of data‐limited species by enabling estimates of abundance, survival, and other parameters for populations that are challenging to assess. However, CKMR models have received limited sensitivity testing under realistic population dynamics and sampling scenarios, impeding the application of the method in population monitoring programs and stock assessments. Here, we use individual‐based simulation to examine how unmodeled population dynamics and aging uncertainty affect the accuracy and precision of CKMR parameter estimates under different sampling strategies. We then present adapted models that correct the biases that arise from model misspecification. Our results demonstrate that a simple base‐case CKMR model produces robust estimates of population abundance with stable populations that breed annually; however, if a population trend or non‐annual breeding dynamics are present, or if year‐specific estimates of abundance are desired, a more complex CKMR model must be constructed. In addition, we show that CKMR can generate reliable abundance estimates for adults from a variety of sampling strategies, including juvenile‐focused sampling where adults are never directly observed (and aging error is minimal). Finally, we apply a CKMR model that has been adapted for population growth and intermittent breeding to two decades of genetic data from juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) in Bimini, Bahamas, to demonstrate how application of CKMR to samples drawn solely from juveniles can contribute to monitoring efforts for highly mobile populations. Overall, this study expands our understanding of the biological factors and sampling decisions that cause bias in CKMR models, identifies key areas for future inquiry, and provides recommendations that can aid biologists in planning and implementing an effective CKMR study, particularly for long‐lived data‐limited species.

A modified mark-recapture Jolly-Seber model for open animal populations

Full Open Population Capture-Recapture Models with Individual Covariates

Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach

Mark-Recapture with Multiple Non-invasive Marks

Modelling insect demography from capture–recapture data: comparison between the constrained linear models and the Jolly–Seber analytical method

Using known births to account for delayed marking in population estimation of North Atlantic right whales

A Bayesian Semiparametric Jolly-Seber Model with Individual Heterogeneity: An Application to Migratory Mallards at Stopover

Maximum empirical likelihood estimation for abundance in a closed population from capture-recapture data

Continuous-time multi-state capture-recapture models

A Nonparametric Approach to the Analysis of Two-Stage Mark-Recapture Experiments

A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations

Semi-Markov Arnason-Schwarz models

Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close‐kin mark‐recapture assessments

Latent multinomial models for extended batch-mark data

Penalized empirical likelihood estimation and EM algorithms for closed-population capture-recapture models

A general modelling framework for open wildlife populations based on the polya tree prior

Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management

On Population Size Estimators in the Poisson Mixture Model

Geostatistical capture–recapture models

A Penalized Empirical Likelihood Approach for Estimating Population Sizes under the Negative Binomial Regression Model

The importance of sampling design for unbiased estimation of survival using joint live-recapture and live resight models