Abstract:Wildlife surveys often seek to determine the presence or absence of species at sites. Such data may be used in population monitoring, impact assessment, and species– habitat analyses. An implicit assumption of presence/absence surveys is that if a species is not detected in one or more visits to a site, it is absent from that site. However, it is rarely if ever possible to be completely sure that a species is absent, and false negative observation errors may arise when detection probabilities are less than 1. The detectability of species in wildlife surveys is one of the most important sources of uncertainty in determining the proportion of a landscape that is occupied by a species. Recent studies emphasize the need to acknowledge and incorporate false negative observation error rates in the analysis of site occupancy data, although a comparative study of the range of available methods for estimating detectability and occupancy is notably absent. The motivation for this study stems from the lack of guidance in the literature about the relative merits of alternative methods for estimating detection probabilities and site occupancy proportions from presence/absence survey data. Six approaches to estimating underlying detection probabilities and the proportion of sites occupied from binary observation data are reviewed. These include three parametric methods based on binomial mixtures, one nonparametric approach based on mark–recapture theory, and two approaches based on simplistic assumptions about occupancy rates. We compare the performance of each method using simulated data for which the “true” underlying detection rate is known. Simulated data were realized from a beta‐binomial distribution, incorporating a realistic level of variation in detection rates. Estimation methods varied in their precision and bias. The “binomial‐with‐added‐zeros” mixture model, estimated by maximum likelihood, was the least biased estimator of detection probability and, therefore, occupancy rate. We provide an Excel spreadsheet to execute all of the methods reviewed. Stand‐alone programs such as PRESENCE may be used to estimate all models including the “binomial with added zeros” model. Our findings lend support to the use of maximum likelihood methods in estimating site occupancy and detectability rates.

A Nonparametric Approach to the Analysis of Two-Stage Mark-Recapture Experiments

Estimation in Independent Observer Line Transect Surveys for Clustered Populations

Two-step semiparametric empirical likelihood inference from capture–recapture data with missing covariates

Animal abundance estimation in independent observer line transect surveys

Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach

Two-stage approaches to the analysis of occupancy data I: The homogeneous case

Two-stage approaches to the analysis of occupancy data II. The heterogeneous model and conditional likelihood

Estimation of Population Size from Biased Samples Using Non-Parametric Binary Regression

Small Sample Inference for Two‐Way Capture‐Recapture Experiments

Model-based Inference for Two-Stage Cluster Samples Subject to Nonignorable Item Nonresponse

Mark-Recapture with Multiple Non-invasive Marks

On two-stage adaptive cluster sampling to assess pest density.

Maximum empirical likelihood estimation for abundance in a closed population from capture-recapture data

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis for Two-stream Capture-Recapture Methods in Disease Surveillance

Maximum Likelihood Abundance Estimation From Capture-Recapture Data When Covariates Are Missing At Random

Consequences of ignoring variable and spatially autocorrelated detection probability in spatial capture-recapture

PRECISION AND BIAS OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POINT SURVEY DETECTION PROBABILITIES

Two-stage, model-assisted estimation using remotely sensed auxiliary data

Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects

The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture–recapture analysis

Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance