Abstract:Models of population dynamics are frequently used for purposes such as testing hypotheses about density dependence and predicting species' responses to future environmental change or conservation actions. Fitting models of population dynamics to field data is challenging because most data sets are characterized by observation error, which can inflate estimates of process variation if ignored. Recently, state‐space models have been developed to deal with this problem by directly modeling both the observation error and the ecological process of interest. Conventional state‐space models, however, have several important limitations: (1) they assume that random effects are Gaussian distributed, which implies that abundance can be negative and that false positive observation errors are equally likely as false negative errors; (2) they do not admit spatial variation in population dynamics; and (3) some of the parameters of the model are not estimable. We demonstrate how each of these problems can be resolved using a class of hierarchical models proposed by Dail and Madsen (2011) that attributes observation error to imperfect detection. We expand this class of models to accommodate classical growth models (e.g., exponential and Ricker‐logistic), zero‐inflation, and random effects. We also present methods for forecasting population size under future environmental conditions. Implementation of these ideas is possible using either frequentist or Bayesian methods, as demonstrated by accompanying R and JAGS code. Results of a simulation study suggest that bias is negligible and coverage nominal in most cases for the proposed model extensions. An analysis of data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey highlights how these methods can be readily applied to existing data, but it also suggests that precision will be low when direct information about detection probability (such as is collected using distance sampling or replicated counts) is lacking.

Full Open Population Capture-Recapture Models with Individual Covariates

Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach

Geostatistical capture–recapture models

Maximum empirical likelihood estimation for abundance in a closed population from capture-recapture data

A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture‐recapture data

A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations

A modified mark-recapture Jolly-Seber model for open animal populations

Full likelihood inference for abundance from continuous time capture–recapture data

Continuous-time multi-state capture-recapture models

Two-step semiparametric empirical likelihood inference from capture–recapture data with missing covariates

Penalized empirical likelihood estimation and EM algorithms for closed-population capture-recapture models

Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects

Evaluating tools for capture-recapture model selection to estimate the size of hidden populations: It works in practice, but does it work in theory?

Maximum Likelihood Abundance Estimation From Capture-Recapture Data When Covariates Are Missing At Random

Explicit modeling of density dependence in spatial capture-recapture models

Improved state-space models for inference about spatial and temporal variation in abundance from count data

Population size estimation with capture-recapture in presence of individual misidentification and low recapture

Estimating the size of a closed population by modeling latent and observed heterogeneity

The importance of sampling design for unbiased estimation of survival using joint live-recapture and live resight models

A Nonparametric Approach to the Analysis of Two-Stage Mark-Recapture Experiments

A general modelling framework for open wildlife populations based on the polya tree prior