Abstract:Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are now widely used for estimating density from repeated individual spatial encounters. SCR accounts for the inherent spatial autocorrelation in individual detections by modelling detection probabilities as a function of distance between the detectors and individual activity centres. However, additional spatial heterogeneity in detection probability may still creep in due to environmental or sampling characteristics. if unaccounted for, such variation can lead to pronounced bias in population size estimates. Using simulations, we describe and test three Bayesian SCR models that use generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to account for latent heterogeneity in baseline detection probability across detectors using: independent random effects (RE), spatially autocorrelated random effects (SARE), and a two-group finite mixture model (FM). Overall, SARE provided the least biased population size estimates (median RB: -9 -- 6%). When spatial autocorrelation was high, SARE also performed best at predicting the spatial pattern of heterogeneity in detection probability. At intermediate levels of autocorrelation, spatially-explicit estimates of detection probability obtained with FM where more accurate than those generated by SARE and RE. In cases where the number of detections per detector is realistically low (at most 1), all GLMMs considered here may require dimension reduction of the random effects by pooling baseline detection probability parameters across neighboring detectors ("aggregation") to avoid over-parameterization. The added complexity and computational overhead associated with SCR-GLMMs may only be justified in extreme cases of spatial heterogeneity. However, even in less extreme cases, detecting and estimating spatially heterogeneous detection probability may assist in planning or adjusting monitoring schemes.

Penalized empirical likelihood estimation and EM algorithms for closed-population capture-recapture models

Maximum empirical likelihood estimation for abundance in a closed population from capture-recapture data

Semiparametric empirical likelihood inference for abundance from one-inflated capture-recapture data

Maximum Likelihood Abundance Estimation From Capture-Recapture Data When Covariates Are Missing At Random

Full likelihood inference for abundance from continuous time capture–recapture data

Two-step semiparametric empirical likelihood inference from capture–recapture data with missing covariates

A Penalized Empirical Likelihood Approach for Estimating Population Sizes under the Negative Binomial Regression Model

Estimating the size of a closed population by modeling latent and observed heterogeneity

Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach

Nearly optimal capture-recapture sampling and empirical likelihood weighting estimation for M-estimation with big data

Full Open Population Capture-Recapture Models with Individual Covariates

Adaptive Empirical Likelihood Estimation with Nonignorable Nonresponse Data

Nearly Optimal Two-step Poisson Sampling and Empirical Likelihood Weighting Estimation for M-estimation with Big Data

On Population Size Estimators in the Poisson Mixture Model

Empirical Likelihood for Estimating Equations with Nonignorably Missing Data.

Population size estimation with capture-recapture in presence of individual misidentification and low recapture

Evaluating tools for capture-recapture model selection to estimate the size of hidden populations: It works in practice, but does it work in theory?

Empirical Likelihood for Nonlinear Regression Models with Nonignorable Missing Responses

Maximum Likelihood Estimations and EM Algorithms with Length-biased Data

Statistical Inferences for Missing Response Problems Based on Modified Empirical Likelihood

Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects