Abstract:Here, we investigate the sensitivity of close‐kin mark‐recapture (CKMR) models to violations of underlying assumptions, and then propose and test modified approaches that correct the bias. We find that base‐case CKMR models are sensitive to unmodeled population dynamics and measurement error including interannual fluctuations in population size, intermittent breeding dynamics, and aging error. We then present adapted models that account for the hidden population dynamics, and – using both simulation and real genetic data – show that targeted sampling of juveniles that can be reliably aged can eliminate the bias that arises from errors in aging. Obtaining robust estimates of population abundance is a central challenge hindering the conservation and management of many threatened and exploited species. Close‐kin mark‐recapture (CKMR) is a genetics‐based approach that has strong potential to improve the monitoring of data‐limited species by enabling estimates of abundance, survival, and other parameters for populations that are challenging to assess. However, CKMR models have received limited sensitivity testing under realistic population dynamics and sampling scenarios, impeding the application of the method in population monitoring programs and stock assessments. Here, we use individual‐based simulation to examine how unmodeled population dynamics and aging uncertainty affect the accuracy and precision of CKMR parameter estimates under different sampling strategies. We then present adapted models that correct the biases that arise from model misspecification. Our results demonstrate that a simple base‐case CKMR model produces robust estimates of population abundance with stable populations that breed annually; however, if a population trend or non‐annual breeding dynamics are present, or if year‐specific estimates of abundance are desired, a more complex CKMR model must be constructed. In addition, we show that CKMR can generate reliable abundance estimates for adults from a variety of sampling strategies, including juvenile‐focused sampling where adults are never directly observed (and aging error is minimal). Finally, we apply a CKMR model that has been adapted for population growth and intermittent breeding to two decades of genetic data from juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) in Bimini, Bahamas, to demonstrate how application of CKMR to samples drawn solely from juveniles can contribute to monitoring efforts for highly mobile populations. Overall, this study expands our understanding of the biological factors and sampling decisions that cause bias in CKMR models, identifies key areas for future inquiry, and provides recommendations that can aid biologists in planning and implementing an effective CKMR study, particularly for long‐lived data‐limited species.

Mark-Recapture with Multiple Non-invasive Marks

Continuous-time multi-state capture-recapture models

Estimating population size with repeated observations of non-invasive sampling in presence of misidentification

Using known births to account for delayed marking in population estimation of North Atlantic right whales

Latent multinomial models for extended batch-mark data

Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close‐kin mark‐recapture assessments

Sources of bias in applying close‐kin mark–recapture to terrestrial game species with different life histories

A Nonparametric Approach to the Analysis of Two-Stage Mark-Recapture Experiments

Spatial Capture-recapture with Partial Identity

Population size estimation with capture-recapture in presence of individual misidentification and low recapture

A flexible framework for spatial capture-recapture with unknown identities

Finite mixtures in capture–recapture surveys for modeling residency patterns in marine wildlife populations

A modified mark-recapture Jolly-Seber model for open animal populations

Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach

Semi-Markov Arnason-Schwarz models

Incorporating telemetry information into capture‐recapture analyses improves precision and accuracy of abundance estimates given spatiotemporally biased recapture effort

A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations

Estimating spatially-varying density and time-varying demographics with open population spatial capture-recapture: a photo-ID case study on bottlenose dolphins in Barataria Bay, Louisana, USA

The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture–recapture analysis

Simulation-based inference for close-kin mark-recapture: implications for small populations and nonrandom mating

Population genomics of C. melanopterus using target gene capture data: demographic inferences and conservation perspectives