The comparative study on domestic ultrasonic equipments and imported ultrasonic equipments in scanning and display in normal appendix

马相国,赵林英,崔立刚,郭丽娟,王金锐
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2015.06.001
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective: The article is to compare differences between domestic ultrasonic equipments and imported ultrasonic equipments in displaying normal appendix structures, and discuss the feasibility that basic-level hospitals use domestic ultrasound devices to examine appendix. Methods: Fourty-one asymptomatic medical examiners are scanned in appendix in turns in domestic ultrasonic equipments and imported ultrasonic equipment. And the root, lumen and boundary of the normal appendix are observed. They are analyzed and contrasted by clarity of image’s two-dimensional structures and fine structures. It is evaluated and scored by semi-quantitative assessments. Exact probability method is used for statistical analysis. Results:Among normal people’s 41 cases (more than 4 points are belonged to the level of clear display), the whole clear display rate of appendix in domestic ultrasonic equipments is 92.7%, that in imported ultrasonic equipment is 97.6%. The total score of appendix in domestic ultrasonic equipments is 530, and that in imported colored ultrasonic equipments is 567 points(x2=1.885, x2=4.316, x2=1.584;P>0.05). Conclusion:In basic-level hospitals, there are no significant differences in display of normal appendix between domestic ultrasonic equipments and imported ultrasonic equipments. Domestic ultrasonic equipments can be popularized in basic-level hospitals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?