Diagnostic Method of Ultrasonic and Pathology for Thyroid Carcinoma: A comparative Study

YuanWenli,WangYumei,WangYong,Wei Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.017.
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the results of ultrasound diagnosis with pathological diagnosis for thyroid carcinoma , and discuss the coincidence rate of ultrasound diagnosis , to explore the advantages of ultrasound imaging diagnosis and the clinical value on the diagnosis of thyroid cancer . Methods From 2011 to 2015, the clinical data of 102 patients with thyroid diseases admitted in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients with thyroid diseases were examined by ultrasonography and pathological respectively , and the detection rate of thyroid cancer diagnosed by ultrasound imaging and the coincidence rate of all types of thyroid cancer were investigated .The SPSS17.0 software was used to analyze . The coincidence rate and misdiagnosis rate of ultrasonic and pathological were expressed in percentage (%) , and compared by chi square test , the difference was statistically significant when P <0.05. Results Among the 102 patients, 83 cases were diagnosed as thyroid cancer .The coincidence rate of ultrasound and pathological were 91.6%(76/83), and the misdiagnosis rate was 8.4%(7/83).Among them, there were 60 cases of papillary carcinoma , 12 cases of follicular carcinoma , 4 cases of medullary carcinoma respectively, and the diagnostic accordance rates were 92.3%, 92.3%and 80%respectively.Between the benign and malignant thyroid masses , there were significant differences in the characteristics of the edge , echo, microcalcification, longitudinal and transverse ratio , and the classification of blood flow (P<0.05). Conclusions The diagnosis of ultrasound imaging has the advantages of rapid and non-invasive in detecting thyroid carcinoma and distinguishing benign and malignant tumors .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?