Effects of thyroid ultrasound, BRAF gene mutation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology single use and combination in diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules

戴亚丽,蓝薇,孙德胜,刘军,叶静,吴佩娴,韩令川,谢谦,卢东晖,林远
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115570-20200131.00118
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound, BRAF gene mutation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)and fine needle aspiration(FNA)single use and combination in diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Methods:A retrospective study was performed on 108 cases of patients with thyroid nodules who were admitted in the department of Endocrinology, department of Special Diagnosis and department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from October 2014 to January 2017.There were 35 males and 73 females, aged(38.1±11.3)years old, ranging from 18 to 69 years old.Ultrasound, BRAF gene mutation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and FNA were used to diagnose the benign and malignant.The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and positive predictive values of each method were calculated based on the postoperative pathological results.Results:The accuracy of ultrasound was 55.65%, the sensitivity was 86.95%, and the positive predictive value was 88.24%.The mutation accuracy of BRAF gene was 67.83%, the sensitivity was 63.27%, and the positive predictive value was 98.41%.The accuracy of CEUS was 84.35%, the sensitivity was 91.84%, and the positive predictive value was 90.00%.The accuracy of FNA was 94.78%, the sensitivity was 95.92%, and the positive predictive value was 97.92%.The accuracy of CEUS combined with FNA was 88.70%, the sensitivity was 97.96%, and the positive predictive value was 89.72%.The accuracy of BRAF gene mutation combined with FNA was 95.65%, the sensitivity was 97.96%, and the positive predictive value was 96.97%.The accuracy and sensitivity of the combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and BRAF gene mutation with FNA were 88.70%, 97.96%, and the positive predictive value was 89.72%.Conclusion:According to the comprehensive diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and positive predictive value, FNA is the best diagnostic method, followed by CEUS, BRAF gene mutation is slightly worse, and ultrasound is the worst.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combining with FNA and BRAF gene mutation or contrast-enhanced ultrasound combining with FNA and BRAF gene mutation do not increase the diagnostic effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?