Clinical evaluation of quadripolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy

胡凯,陈康玉,严激,徐健,苏浩,安春生,宇霏,王齐,杨冬妹
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2016.02.002
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a quadripolar left ventricular(LV) lead in improving the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Methods A total of 113 patients received CRT who had complete follow-up data in Anhui Provincial Hospital from September 2013 to June 2015 were selected and divided into quadripolar lead group (37 patients) and bipolar lead group (76 patients) according to the type of left.ventriculàr lead.All patients were followed up for 6 months after implantation.CRT efficacy was assessed by echocardiography.Results There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline.Stroke volume(SV) 、aortic velocity time integral(VTI) 、QRS duration、standard deviation of 12 LV segments' Ts(Ts-SD) were significantly improved in both groups and were better in quadripolar lead group after implantation than in bipolar lead group(P<0.05).After 3 months,the LVEF was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05),but the LVEF in quadripolar lead group was higher than that in bipolar lead group(0.33±0.11 vs.0.30±0.07).There were significant differences in Left ventricular end-systolic volume [LVESV,(174.2±93.5)ml vs.(210.0±81.4)ml) 、LVEF(0.39±0.13 vs.0.34±0.09) 、FS(19.8%±7.8% vs.16.5%±4.4%) after 6 months (P<0.05).Quadripolar lead group had a higher surper-response rate(32.4% vs.26.3%,P =0.498)and a lower non-response rate than bipolar lead group in tendency (21.6% vs.34.2%,P =0.24),but there were no significantce.Conclusions Compared with traditional bipolar lead,quadripolar LV lead could not only make better contributions to acute hemodynamic response and heart synchronicity,but also increase the degree of left ventricular reverse remodeling to CRT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?