Clinical Analysis of Retrograde Coronary Venography and Left Ventricular Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

臧红云,王冬梅,韩雅玲,于海波,邓捷,荆全民,王祖禄,王守力

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2007.03.002

2007-01-01

Abstract:Objective To analyze the feasibility and safety of retrograde coronary venography(RCV)and left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Methods Sixty one patients(52 men and 9 women,mean age 59.4±11.7 years)with NYHA class Ⅲ-Ⅳ received CRT from April 2001 to December 2006.The etiologies of heart failure were idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in 35 patients,ischemic heart disease in 19 patients and hypertension cardiomyopathy in 7 patients.The inclusion criteria were ventricular end-diastolic dimension 55 mm and LVEF0.40.The choice for veinous approach and left ventricular lead were individualized according to different venous anatomy in order to obtain ideal pacing position.Results RCV was completed 63 times in 61 patients.Left ventricular leads were located in lateral vein in 28 patients,posterior lateral vein in 18 patients,middle cardiac vein in 9 patients,communicating branch of lateral vein and middle cardiac vein in 4 patients and anterior interventricular vein in 2 patients.Coronary artery dissection and myocardial perforation took place in 2 patients and pericardial tamponade in 1 patient during the operation.One patient had experienced 2 failed attempts of CRT due to vein stenosis and dissection.CRT was completed successfully in the third attempt without dissection and pericardial tamponade because of the application of soft coronary sinus lead and thin OTW lead.Small dissection and myocardial perforation and pericardial effusion took place in other 2 patients which had not affected the procedures because of stable hemodynamics.Different degree of vein stenosis was found in 3 patients.The left ventricular lead passed through successfully in the patient with 50% vein stenosis without dilatation and also in another patient with 80% stenosis after dilatation with PTCA balloon.A thin OTW 1056T lead was needed in the third patient having vein stenosis of 50% in the proximal end.Conclusion Since there is great variation in the anatomy of coronary veins,the optimal location for left ventricular lead implantation can be archieved in the lateral and the posterior lateral vein or sometimes in the middle cardiac vein.Porper operation and choice of devices can minimize the occurance of complications.