Impact of left ventricular lead position on clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

WANG Jing-feng,SU Yan-gang,BAI Jin,WANG Wei,QIN Sheng-mei,GE Jun-bo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2012.01.012
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss the impact of left ventricular(LV) lead postion on clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Method A total of 121 patients with chronic heart failure received CRT,among whom 93 cases had a LV lead placed in posterolateral vein,lateral vein or posterior vein(group A);16 cases placed in middle cardiac vein(group B) and 12 cases in great cardiac vein(group C).Before and 6 months after implantation,NYHA functional class,electrocardiogram and echocardiography were evaluated for all the subjects.Results As for subjects in group A,NYHA class improved,QRS duration narrowed,LV ejection fraction elevated and LV dimension(both end-diastolic and end-systolic) reduced after CRT(P<0.01);though part of echocardiographic parameters and QRS duration were significantly improved in group B,their NYHA class had no significant change;In group C,none of these parameters were improved(P>0.05).Conclusion The LV lead ought to be placed at the lateral or posterolateral wall of left ventricle in CRT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?