Choice of right ventricular pacing site for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation

Jingfeng Wang,Haiyan Chen,Yangang Su,Junbo Ge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2014.06.008
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine a more easily located right ventricular pacing site for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.Methods A total of 40 patients from Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University,who had indications for permanent pacemaker implantation accompanied with severe tricuspid regurgitation were enrolled.They were randomized into two groups:group A (designed for right ventricular outflow tract septum pacing) and group B(designed for right ventricular apex pacing).The short-axis fractional shortening(FS) at right ventricular(RV) body and right ventricular outflow tract(RVOT) were acquired before implantation.The time of X-ray exposure for ventricle lead location and number of repositions were documented during implantation.We also made a comparison of pacing parameters (including pacing thresholds,amplitude of R-wave and impedances) between RV apex and RVOT septum pacing,both in the course of implantation and 3 months after implantation.Results There were 20 patients in group A and group B respectively.X-ray exposure time required for ventricle lead placement in group A was significant shorter than in group B[(113.5±33.8) s vs.(156.3± 58.1) s,P =0.007].Lead dislogrnent was observed in one case (5.0%)for group A while 6 cases (30.0%)for group B during implantation,all underwent lead reposition (P=0.037).No significant difference of lead parameters was noted between the two groups.All subjects demonstrated significantly larger short-axis FS at RV body than at RVOT(33.7%±5.4% vs.27.1%±4.4%,P<0.01) . Conclusion For patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation,active-fixation lead could be more easily attached to RVOT septum than to RVA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?