Effects of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract and Right Ventricular Apex Pacing on Ventricular Contraction Synchrony and Cardiac Function

ZHANG Tao,SHANG Li-hua,CUI Jian,JIANG He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9688.2013.01.008
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To compare the effects of right ventricular outflow tract(RVOT) septum pacing and right ventricular apex(RVA) pacing on ventricular contraction synchrony and cardiac function.Methods A total of 50 patients with sick sinus syndrome were randomized into two different cardiac pacing sites of RVOT(RVOT group,n=25) and RVA(RVA group,n=25).Ventricular contraction synchrony and cardiac function were studied under pacing rhythm of ventricular pacing and independent rhythm by adjusting to the auriculoventricular(AV) interval 1 month after pacemaker implantation.Results Duration of electrode implantation and duration of X-ray exposure in RVOT group and RVA group had no significant difference(P0.05).All the patients did not suffer from implantation complications and there was no significant difference in pacing parameters during follow up between the two groups(P0.05).QRS durations after pacing in RVOT group and RVA group significantly increased [RVOT group:(135±8) ms vs.(88±8) ms,P0.001;RVA group:(154±8) ms vs.(90±6) ms,P0.001],and QRS durations in RVA group widened much more than those in RVOT group(P0.001).In the two groups,interventricular mechanical delay(IVMD) and septal to posterior wall motion delay(SPWMD) significantly increased after pacing(P0.001);IVMD and SPWMD in RVA group widened much more than those in RVOT group [IVMD:(38±7) ms vs.(24±5) ms,P0.001;SPWMD:(118±21) ms vs.(60±11) ms,P0.001].Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction of the two groups were manifested no significant changes(P0.05).Conclusions Right ventricular pacing results in ventricular desynchronization.RVOT pacing is a better pacing site with less influence on ventricular contraction synchrony.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?