Abstracts from the World Congress of Cardiology Scientific Sessions
Ming Bai,Qiang Li,Zheng Zhang,Aiyun Deng,Tao Wang,Shijie Wang,Suyu Yao,Haibo Yu,Dongmei Wang,Hongyun Zang,Donghong Zhang,Ye Tian,Yong Han,Lili Zhang,Bo Yu,Shufeng Li,Shuo Zhang,Leonardo Ribeiro,Juan Carlos Pachón,Clizenaldo Timothe,Adela Alba‐Leonel,Mohamed Hussain,Remy Nélson Albornoz Vargas,Amanda G. M. R. Sousa,Carlos Morillo,Qingyan Zhao,He Huang,Yanhong Tang,Xi Wang,Congxin Huang,Xiaorong Hu,Hong Jiang,Xin Zhou,Bo Cui,Cheng Xu,Zhibing Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.192773
IF: 37.8
2010-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:Introduction:The detrimental effects of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function has driven interest in selective site pacing, predominantly on the right ventricular mid-sepal pacing.There is currently no information on long-term ventricular lead electrical performance from this site.To investigate the feasibility and safety in patients with right ventricular mid-sepal pacing with active fixation lead compared to passive fixation in right ventricular apex.Methods: All patients who underwent successful implantation of permanent pacemakers between January 2005 and April 2008 were retrospectively analyzed, included 101 cases with right ventricular mid-septal pacing (RVSP) and 126 cases selected in at the same time with standard right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP).Guided by X ray, The right ventricular septum was divided into six segments, and active leads were fixed in mid-septum accurately.X-ray exposure time, parameters of leads implantation, ECG were recorded during operation.The follow-up data of 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post implantation were recorded too.Results: X-ray exposure time (6.98Ϯ4.12min vs. 6.79Ϯ3.69,PϾ0.05)was similar between two groups.Pacing QRS duration in RVSP group was shorter than that in RVAP group significantly (98.19Ϯ22.30vs. 120.80Ϯ24.14,PϽ0.01).There was no difference in R wave height during leads implantation (10.11Ϯ4.73 vs. 11.61Ϯ6.62,PϾ0.05).Stimulation threshold, electric current and impedance had significant difference (RVSP vs. RVAP is 0.76Ϯ0.30Vvs 0.39Ϯ0.10V, 0.98Ϯ0.52mAvs. 0.36Ϯ0.19mA, respectively, PϽ0.01), the difference showed the trend of decrease in period of follow-up, but was statistically different (stimulation threshold comparison of 6 months, PϽ0.05, and the other parameters of follow-up, PϽ0.01).However, ventricular lead parameters were acceptable with stable long-term stimulation thresholds and impedance.All the patients came through the operation without complications.There was no case of lead dislocation, high pacing thresholds or inadequate sensing.Conclusion: By the guidance of ventricular septum subarea under X ray, active leads were fixed in mid-septum accurately and rapidly.X-ray exposure time was short, and pacing QRS duration was shorter.In long term follow-up, the parameters were stable and acceptable.There was no case of lead dislocation, high pacing thresholds or inadequate sensing.The site of Right ventricular mid-septal pacing is feasible and safe, should be used widely in clinical practice.