Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND/ INTRODUCTION Lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Mechanisms proposed to explain CIED-induced TR can be classified as primary (implantation-related, lead-related) and secondary (pacing related). Primary CIED-induced TR results from the direct interaction of the lead with the tricuspid valve (TV). Determination of exact lead position via echocardiography is crucial however often difficult via standard views. Previous research has shown the value of an atypical subcostal 2D en-face view to describe the exact anatomy of the TV (Figure 1) (1-3). PURPOSE In this prospective observational investigation, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of the subcostal 2D en-face view of the TV to determine RV lead position at the level of TV passage and thereby to unmask potentially unfavorable lead-positions and interactions with the TV, which might otherwise remain unnoted. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent implantation of CIED with at least one RV lead were prospectively included. Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed before and after the procedure. An en-face view of the TV by an approximately 90° counter-clockwise rotation of the transducer from a standard subcostal 4-chamber view was attempted in all patients. Exact lead-position (e.g. postero-septal commissural, central, etc., see Figure 1) was described whenever possible. RESULTS A total of 35 patients were included in the final analysis, median age was 62 years, 27/35 (77%) were male. Thirteen patients (37%) already had an RV lead prior to the recent procedure and therefore showed 2 or more leads passing the TV in post-procedural controls. Implanted devices included cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) (7/35 patients, 20%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (11/35 patients, 31%), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (7/35 patients 20%) and pacemaker (PM) (7/35 patients, 20%). Three patients (9%) received an additional RV lead due to RV lead dysfunction. The exact position of the RV lead could be determined applying the en-face view in 27/35 patients (77%). In the majority of cases (20/35 patients, 57%), the RV lead passed through the tricuspid plane in a postero-septal commissural position. Central trajectory was observed in 5/35 patients (14%). Anteroseptal and anteroposterior passage were each found in one patient. In the remaining 8/35 patients (23%), lead position could not be determined due to inferior image quality from the subcostal view. CONCLUSIONS RV lead position can be determined from a subcostal en-face view of the TV in a majority of patients after CIED implantation. Hereby, 2D-TTE can add significant value to the management, follow-up, and monitoring and should therefore be included in the standard TTE protocol of every patient with CIED. Abstract Figure 1

Pacing Lead is More Easily Located at RVOT Septum in Patients with Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Choice of right ventricular pacing site for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Nonapical Right Ventricular Pacing Is Associated with Less Tricuspid Valve Interference and Long-Term Progress of Tricuspid Regurgitation

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

Pacing sites and modes in cardiac resynchronization therapy]

Effects of right ventricular lead location on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: practical and beneficial. A 9-year experience of 460 consecutive implants

Follow-up of right ventricular outflow tract and right ventricular apex pacing

Cardiac Pacemaker and the Effect on Hemodynamics of the Tricuspid Valve

A meta‐analysis of the distance between lead‐implanted site and tricuspid valve annulus with postoperative tricuspid regurgitation deterioration in patients with left bundle branch area pacing

Assessing the position of pacemaker leads via transthoracic echocardiography: a prospective study

Impact of Interlead Distance on Immediate and Mid-Term Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Relationship between left ventricular-right ventricular interlead distance and acute hemodynamic response during cardiac resynchronization therapy

Position selection and X-ray characteristics for the right ventricular septal pacing——a simple method to identify the site that can get narrow post-pacing QRS wave.

Influence of the Right Ventricular Lead Location on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Impact of lead position on tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular function, and heart failure exacerbation and mortality after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Preliminary results from the PACE-RVTR Registry

Retrospective analysis of application of left ventricular active fixation lead in 26 cases

Differences in Electrical Delay Between the Mid-septum and Apex with the Right Ventricular Lead: Novel Implications for Pacemaker Sensing