Abstract:Aim: During cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), optimized programming of the atrioventricular (AV) delay and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) interval can lead to improved hemodynamics, symptomatic response, and left ventricular systolic function. Currently, however, there is no recommendation for the best optimization method. This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of 4 different CRT optimization methods. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four consecutive CRT patients with severe heart failure and left bundle-branch block configuration were randomly assigned into four groups to undergo AV/VV delay optimization through echocardiogram (ECHO; n = 30), electrocardiogram (ECG; n = 32), QuickOpt algorithm (n = 28), and nominal AV/VV (n = 36) groups. Patients were followed up and underwent examinations, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac functional classification, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), and echocardiography, at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The patients’ survival and clinical outcomes were compared among the four groups. Results: Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that the median survival was the same in the 4 groups: ECHO, 43 months; ECG, 44 months; QuickOpt, 44 months, and nominal, 41 months. At the 6-month follow-up, the reduction in left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was significantly less in the nominal group (–1.91 ± 2.58 mm) than that in the other three groups (ECHO: –3.70 ± 2.78 mm, p = 0.012; ECG: –3.53 ± 3.14 mm, p = 0.020; QuickOpt: –3.46 ± 2.65 mm, p = 0.032); 6MWD was significantly shorter in the nominal group (87.88 ± 34.76 m) than that in the other three groups (ECHO: 120.63 ± 56.93 m, p = 0.006; ECG: 114.97 ± 54.95 m, p = 0.020; QuickOpt: 114.57 ± 35.41 m, p = 0.027). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased in ECHO (7.23 ± 2.76%, p = 0.010), ECG (8.50 ± 3.17%, p < 0.001), and QuickOpt (8.39 ± 2.90%, p < 0.001) compared with the nominal group (5.35 ± 2.59%). There were no significant differences among the groups in the aforementioned parameters at 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. Conclusion: While LVEDD, LVEF, 6MWD, and NYHA were significantly improved in ECHO, ECG, and QuickOpt at 6 months, there were no significant improvements in any of the groups at 12, 24, and 48 months. These findings suggested that the long-term effect of the four CRT methods for heart failure was not significantly different.

Comparative study of interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy using electrocardiography versus using echocardiography

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of an intracardiac electrogram-based atrioventricular and interventricular intervals optimization method in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

A Study of Mechanical Optimization Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on an Electromechanical Model

Optimal atrioventricular and interventricular delay in patients with congestive heart failure post cardiac resynchronization therapy: hemodynamics and short-term follow-up

Impact of Real-Time Optimization of Interventricular Interval Using Multi-Channel Surface Electrocardiogram on the Clinical Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

A comparative study of acute hemodynamic effects of interval optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy patients by echocardiography and QuickOpt function

The clinical evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy optimized AV/VV delay dynamically for patients with congestive heart failure

Effects of echocardiography-guided pacemaker parameters optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Predictive Factors and Clinical Effect of Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Immediate and Short-term Effects of AV-delay Optimization in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Echocardiography

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effects of QuickOpt Optimization in Chinese Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization

Long-term Clinical Effects of Programmer-Guided Atrioventricular and Interventricular Delay Optimization: Intracardiac Electrography Versus Echocardiography for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure.

An Electrographic AV Optimization for the Maximum Integrative Atrioventricular and Ventricular Resynchronization in CRT

Long-Term Effect of Different Optimizing Methods for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: A Randomized and Controlled Pilot Study

Study of the Optimal Pacemaker Parameters in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Ultrasound

Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: May We Predict the Long-Term Clinical Response?

A Simplified Method for Determination of the Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

The role of realtime three-dimensional echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients’ VV optimization

Effect of periodic pacemaker optimization in long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy

Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Synchronicity by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography