Ultrasound-guided Versus Traditional Pudendal Nerve Block for Female Pudendal Neuralgia

贺豪杰,郭红燕,韩劲松,李水清,白志勇

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2017.02.013

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus traditional pudendal nerve block for female pudendal neuralgia . Methods Clinical data of 40 patients with pudendal neuralgia who had received pudendal nerve block therapy between November 2012 and August 2016 were collected.We performed ultrasound guided pudendal nerve block in 19 patients and traditional pudendal nerve block in 21 patients.According to the degree of pain relief , 1 to 3 times of block were performed for each patient.The pain was assessed with visual analog scale ( VAS) before and after nerve block therapy . Results The VAS was decreased significantly in both groups at 24 hours and 3 months after therapy (P=0.000).The ultrasound group had more significant effect at 24 hours after therapy than the traditional group (Z=-2.451, P=0.014).The VAS had no significant difference between the two groups 3 months after therapy (Z=-0.542, P=0.588).The incidence of numbness of the hip and legs was 31.6%(6/19) in ultrasound group, which was significant higher than the traditional group [0 (0/21), Fisher’ s Exact Test, P =0.007].The incidence of dizziness was 38.1% (8/21) in the traditional group, which was significant higher than the ultrasound group [5.3%(1/19),χ2 =4.427, P =0.035]. Conclusions Both ultrasound-guided and traditional pudendal nerve block for pudendal neuralgia are effective.No significant difference is found in short time effect (3 months) between the two groups.