Abstract:Background: Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) is a chronic pain disorder causing unilateral, severe brief stabbing recurrent pain in the distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Conventional radiofrequency (CRF) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) are two types of minimally invasive treatment. CRF selectively ablates the part of ganglion to provide the relief, but it has been found to be associated with some side effects such as dysesthesia or sensory loss in 6%-28% and loss of corneal reflex in 3%-8% of patients. PRF is a comparatively newer modality which is a nondestructive and neuromodulatory method of delivering radiofrequency energy to the gasserian ganglion to produce a therapeutic effect. Aims: We aimed to compare the efficacy of CRF with long-duration, fixed voltage PRF in the treatment of idiopathic TGN. Setting: This study was conducted in a tertiary care center research institute. Study design: This was a prospective randomized trial. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven adult patients of TGN were included in the study and randomly allocated into two groups (CRF and PRF). All procedures were performed operation suite with C-arm fluoroscopic guidance. Both, pre- and postprocedure, the patients were assessed for pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Intensity Scale at 1 week and thereafter at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. Patients with a BNI score ≥4 after 1 month were considered a failure and offered other modes of treatment. A reduction in VAS score ≥50% and a BNI score <4 were considered as effective. Statistical analysis: Discreet variables were recorded as proportions, ordinal variables and continuous variables with non-Gaussian distribution as medians with interquartile range, and continuous variables with Gaussian distribution as mean ± standard deviation. Association between ordinal variables was tested by Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test whenever appropriate. Equality of means/median was tested by using paired/unpaired t-test or nonparametric tests depending upon the distribution of data. P ≤ 0.5 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 13.04 windows. Results: Efficacy in terms of decrease in VAS ≥50% at 1 month was 33.33% and 83.33% in the PRF and CRF groups, respectively, which was statistically significant(P = 0.036). Effective reduction in BNI scores at the 7th day, 1 month, and 2 months postprocedure was evaluated and found in 41.67% and 83.33% of patients in the PRF and CRF groups, respectively, which was statistically insignificant (P = 0.089). There was a statistically significant reduction in BNI scores in PRF and CRF group patients at 3 and 6 months (at 3 months, 33.33% and 83.33%, P = 0.036 and at 6 months, 25% and 83.33%, P = 0.012). In the CRF group, mild hypoesthesia was evident in three patients which improved by the end of 1 month while no side effects were seen in the PRF group. Conclusion: CRF is a more effective procedure to decrease pain in comparison to long-duration, fixed voltage PRF for the treatment of idiopathic TGN. Although the side effects are more with CRF, they are mild and self-limiting.

Efficacy of ganglion impar block combined with pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency for pudendal neuralgia management—a randomized clinical trial

Pulsed Radiofrequency to the Dorsal Root Ganglion or the Sciatic Nerve Reduces Neuropathic Pain Behavior, Decreases Peripheral Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines and Spinal Β-Catenin in Chronic Constriction Injury Rats

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Voltage and Standard-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia: a Pooled Analysis from Randomized Controlled Trials

Effect of sciatic nerve pulsed radiofrequency glial activation levels in spinal dorsal horn in chronic constriction injury rat models and its analgesia effect

CT-guided percutaneous infrazygomatic radiofrequency neurolysis through foramen rotundum to treat V2 trigeminal neuralgia.

Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined with Ganglion Impar Block for Treatment of Perineal Pain.

Ultrasound-guided Versus Traditional Pudendal Nerve Block for Female Pudendal Neuralgia

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ganglion impar block in patients with chronic perineal pain

A Randomized Comparative Study of Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment With or Without Selective Nerve Root Block for Chronic Cervical Radicular Pain

Conventional versus high-voltage, long-term pulse Radiofrequency of ganglion impar in perineal pain with advanced rectal cancer: a Randomized, double-blind controlled trial

Pudendal Nerve Neurolysis in Patients Afflicted With Pudendal Nerve Entrapment: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Their Efficacy

Efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency combined with pregabalin for herpetic neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

(133) Self-Reported Efficacy Of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy As A Treatment For Pudendal Neuralgia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Pudendal Neuralgia

[Neuronavigation-assisted percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of trigeminal gasserian ganglion for refractory craniofacial pain]

Efficacy of Mind-Regulating and Depression-Reliving Acupuncture in Combination with Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of Dorsal Root Ganglion for Post-herpetic Neuralgia

Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency to Cervical Nerve Root for Postherpetic Neuralgia in Upper Extremity

Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined With Methylene Blue Paravertebral Nerve Block Effectively Treats Thoracic Postherpetic Neuralgia

Radiofrequency Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia (Conventional vs. Pulsed): A Prospective Randomized Control Study

Impar ganglion block in patients with pelvic neuropathic pain: Three case Reports and surgical technique

Pudendal nerve blockade for persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD): A clinical review and case report