Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability and main influencing factors of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) using radiographs that had not been premeasured.METHODS:Fifty-six patients with IS, 9 male and 47 female, aged 15.4 (11 - 18), underwent preoperative X-ray photography of spine standing full-length posteroanterior and lateral films and left and right supine side-bending radiographs. The films were read by four orthopedic surgeons independently to do measurement and typing according to the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems respectively. Two weeks later, the sequence of the X-ray films was re-ordered and the 4 surgeons read them and did measurement and typing once more. The average percentage of intraobserver and interobserver agreement was calculated. Kappa coefficients were used to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability.RESULTS:King classification demonstrated fair interobserver reliability and excellent intraobserver reliability. The mean interobserver reliability was 65.8% (Kappa coefficient = 0.542), while the intraobserver reliability was 82.6% (Kappa coefficient = 0.767). The main reason of disagreement was distinguishment of the King type II and type III. Another reason was assessment of King type V. The complete Lenke classification demonstrated poor reliability. The mean interobserver reliability was 50.0% (Kappa coefficient = 0.438), and the intraobserver reliability was 47.0% (Kappa coefficient = 0.402). The 3 components of Lenke classification had fair interobserver and intraobserver reliability when they were examined separately. The main reasons for disagreement arose from judging whether there was a structural upper thoracic curve and assigning sagittal thoracic modifier. The PUMC type demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability with a mean interobserver reliability of 87.8% (Kappa coefficient = 0.757), and a mean intraobserver reliability of 92.9% (Kappa coefficient = 0.958). Its subtypes demonstrated fair agreement with the mean interobserver reliability of 70.2% (Kappa coefficient = 0.629), and a mean intraobserver reliability of 74.1% (Kappa coefficient = 0.674). The main reasons for disagreement were definition of a curvature and Cobb angle measurement.CONCLUSION:King and PUMC classification systems have higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability than Lenke classification. The reliability levels of the 3 classification systems are all influenced by many factors. Judgment of an upper thoracic curve, variable of Cobb angle measurement, and relationship of the central vertical sagittal line to apex of curve are the common reasons for disagreement in these 3 classifications.

Prospective Study of Interobserver and Intraobserver Repeatability and Reliability of PUMC Classification for Idiopathic Scoliosis

Level of Professional Training for Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of PUMC Classifications for Idiopathic Scoliosis

[Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC Classification Systems for Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the New SRS-Schwab Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Reliability of Manual Measurement of Cobb Angle for Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

The Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Humeral Head Ossification System and the Proximal Femur Maturity Index Assessments for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Spinal Deformity Study Group classification of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis

Peking University First Hospital (PUFH) Classification and Treatments for Senile Spinal Kyphotic Deformity.

A Study on Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Huashan Radiologic Classification System for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Fracture and Dislocation

A Computer-Aided Method for Improving the Reliability of Lenke Classification for Scoliosis

Clinical Application of the Roussouly Classification in the Sagittal Balance Reconstruction of 101 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Computer-aided King Classification of Scoliosis

An Independent Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility Evaluation of Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and Kostuik Classification Systems for Spinal Tumor

Prediction of Curve Progression after Posterior Fossa Decompression in Pediatric Patients with Scoliosis Secondary to Chiari Malformation

CT three-dimensional reconstruction evaluates pedicle screw position classification：reliability analysis

Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Assessment of the Axial Trunk Rotation: Manual Versus Smartphone-Aided Measurement Tools

Repeatability of projection grating profilometry system to detect human spinal column morphology

Reliability of End, Stable, Neutral, First Coronal Reverse Vertebrae Identification in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: Intra- and Interobserver Consistency Analysis.

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the Spinal Deformity Study Group Classification for L5-S1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

A Lumbar Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult Patient: Preliminary Approach