Abstract:Purpose Although Roussouly classification has been widely used in spinal surgery, it was mainly applied to degenerative scoliosis patients and correlational studies concerning adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are still insufficient. This retrospective study explored the clinical application of Roussouly classification in surgeries and prognosis prediction for AIS. Methods This clinical research selected 101 AIS patients who received surgeries between August 2005 and November 2019. Whole spine standing radiographs were obtained for each patient preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow‐up (>24 months). All patients were classified into “theoretical types” and “current types.” Patients were further divided into mismatch or match groups based on the consistency of their current type and theoretical type. The main parameters include: proximal junctional angle (PJA), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), fixed thoracic kyphosis (TK), global TK, fixed lumbar lordosis (LL), global LL, thoracic tilt, proximal thoracic alignment (PTA), lumbar tilt, spino‐sacral angle (SSA), and spinal tilt (ST). Results A total of 47.5% of AIS patients were subject to a preoperative mismatch of Roussouly classification. There was a significant difference in PI‐LL between the preoperative mismatch and match groups (p = 0.008). There was a significant difference in the rate of PI‐LL deformity between the match and mismatch groups with a preoperative mismatch (p = 0.037). A significant difference in thoracic tilt was observed between the postoperative mismatch and match groups (p = 0.019). The preoperative mismatch group has a higher risk of postoperative PI‐LL malformation than match group (OR = 2.303, 95% CI: 1.026, 5.165). When mismatch occurred postoperatively, there were significant differences between groups in the rate of pelvic deformity (p = 0.002) and PI‐LL deformity (p = 0.025) at the last follow‐up. Compared with the postoperative match group, mismatch group had an increased risk of pelvic deformity (OR = 5.029, 95% CI: 1.618, 15.629) and PJK deformity (OR = 3.017, 95% CI: 1.709, 11.375) at the last follow‐up. Short Form‐36 and Scoliosis Research Society 22 score of the match group was significantly higher than that of the mismatch group at the last follow‐up. Conclusion The Roussouly classification mismatch before or after operation leads to increased risks of PI‐LL deformity and pelvis deformity postoperatively or at the follow‐up, which seriously worsens the clinical symptoms and prognosis of patients. Therefore, recovering to the theoretical type in Roussouly classification may effectively improve patients' prognosis.

Clinical Application of the Roussouly Classification in the Sagittal Balance Reconstruction of 101 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Restoring the Ideal Roussouly Sagittal Alignment in Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: a Method for Decreasing the Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis.

Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Validation of Roussouly Classification in Predicting the Occurrence of Adjacent Segment Disease after Short-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgery

The Change of Roussouly Classification after Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

[Influence of paraspinal muscle degeneration and postoperative Roussouly classification restoration on mechanical complications in female patients with degenerative scoliosis after surgery]

Pre- and postoperative spinopelvic sagittal balance in adolescent patients with lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis.

Roussouly classification of adult spinal deformity

How to Make a More Optimal Surgical Plan for Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: a Comparative Study Based on the Changes of the Sagittal Alignment and Selection of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra

Analysis of the relationship between coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization

The Association Between Roussouly Sagittal Alignment Type and Risk for Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Short-Segment Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Predictors of Ultimate Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The Impact of Relative Curve Correction on Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

The rotation of preoperative-presumed lowest instrumented vertebra: Is it a risk factor for distal adding-on in Lenke 1A/2A curve treated with selective thoracic fusion?

1079 Preoperative Inflection Point According to the Roussouly Classification Is a Predictor of Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Analysis of Posterior Pedicle Screw-Only Constructs in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with a Minimum Three-Year Follow-Up

Sagittal Balance Parameters and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Does levelling of T1 tilt intra-operatively affect post-operative shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?