P107. Selecting “LTV-1” as lower instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5 scoliosis treated with posterior selective fusion
Zongshan Hu,Zezhang Zhu,Liu Zhen,Li Jie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.332
IF: 4.297
2023-01-01
The Spine Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT For Lenke 5 patients, posterior selective fusion is widely used to reduce the surgical fusion segments, preserve the range of motion of lumbar spine, and ensure a good correction outcome with the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L3 or L4. Previous studies reported that the relative position between LIV and the last touching vertebra (LTV) is a key influencing factor for correction loss and distal superposition, implant failure and proximal junctional kyphosis. However, whether selecting a vertebral body proximal to the lower touching vertebra (LTV-1) as LIV increases the risk of postoperative mechanics-related complications, and whether LTV-1 is selected as a risk factor for LIV remains controversial. PURPOSE To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the "lower touching vertebra (LTV)-1" as the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients Lenke 5 type idiopathic scoliosis with posterior selective fusion surgery, and to investigate the risk factors for implant-related complications during follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective study. OUTCOME MEASURES Radiographic parameters and clinical questionnaires. METHODS The patients with Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior selective fusion and with a minimum of 2 years followup were prospectively recruited in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to distal fusion selection: Group A (LIV at LTV) and Group B (LIV at LTV-1). Group B patients were further divided into Group B1 and B2 according to the occurrence of implant-related complication. Coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were measured on full-spine X-ray films at pre- and postoperation, and the last followup. SRS-22 questionnaire and mechanical complications were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were enrolled in this study (Group A:45; Group B: 58). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, Risser sign, cobb angle at baseline. Both groups showed a high correction rate of the main curvature after surgery (80.6% and 78.7%, p=0.162). Group B showed a higher incidence of mechanical complication with a marginally significant difference (7/45 vs. 12/58, p=0.042). In Group B1 and B2, there were significant differences in trunk shift (C7PL-CSVL) (23.9mm±9.5mm and 14.6mm±11.5mm, p=0.003), LIV tilt (29.2°±3.7 ° and 25.3°±5.3°, p=0.006), and LTV rotation (1.0±0.0 and 0.6±0.5, p=0.002) at preoperation. Logistic regression showed that higher preoperative LIV tilt and C7PL-CSVL were risk factors for implanted-related complications. ROC analysis indicated that when the preoperative LIV tilt was greater than 25.3° or the preoperative trunk deviation was greater than 17.0 mm, there would be a higher incidence of complications during followup. CONCLUSIONS Stopping the distal fusion at LTV-1 and LTV both showed favorable coronal balance and sagittal alignment during a minimum of 2-year followup. Selecting "LTV-1" as LIV in Lenke 5 curve may be sufficient distally and effectively as LTV. However, for patients with a preoperative trunk shift greater than 17.0 mm or LIV rotation greater than 25.3°, LIV selection should be conservative in case of implanted-related complications. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs. For Lenke 5 patients, posterior selective fusion is widely used to reduce the surgical fusion segments, preserve the range of motion of lumbar spine, and ensure a good correction outcome with the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L3 or L4. Previous studies reported that the relative position between LIV and the last touching vertebra (LTV) is a key influencing factor for correction loss and distal superposition, implant failure and proximal junctional kyphosis. However, whether selecting a vertebral body proximal to the lower touching vertebra (LTV-1) as LIV increases the risk of postoperative mechanics-related complications, and whether LTV-1 is selected as a risk factor for LIV remains controversial. To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the "lower touching vertebra (LTV)-1" as the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients Lenke 5 type idiopathic scoliosis with posterior selective fusion surgery, and to investigate the risk factors for implant-related complications during follow-up. Retrospective study. Radiographic parameters and clinical questionnaires. The patients with Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior selective fusion and with a minimum of 2 years followup were prospectively recruited in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to distal fusion selection: Group A (LIV at LTV) and Group B (LIV at LTV-1). Group B patients were further divided into Group B1 and B2 according to the occurrence of implant-related complication. Coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were measured on full-spine X-ray films at pre- and postoperation, and the last followup. SRS-22 questionnaire and mechanical complications were evaluated. A total of 103 patients were enrolled in this study (Group A:45; Group B: 58). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, Risser sign, cobb angle at baseline. Both groups showed a high correction rate of the main curvature after surgery (80.6% and 78.7%, p=0.162). Group B showed a higher incidence of mechanical complication with a marginally significant difference (7/45 vs. 12/58, p=0.042). In Group B1 and B2, there were significant differences in trunk shift (C7PL-CSVL) (23.9mm±9.5mm and 14.6mm±11.5mm, p=0.003), LIV tilt (29.2°±3.7 ° and 25.3°±5.3°, p=0.006), and LTV rotation (1.0±0.0 and 0.6±0.5, p=0.002) at preoperation. Logistic regression showed that higher preoperative LIV tilt and C7PL-CSVL were risk factors for implanted-related complications. ROC analysis indicated that when the preoperative LIV tilt was greater than 25.3° or the preoperative trunk deviation was greater than 17.0 mm, there would be a higher incidence of complications during followup. Stopping the distal fusion at LTV-1 and LTV both showed favorable coronal balance and sagittal alignment during a minimum of 2-year followup. Selecting "LTV-1" as LIV in Lenke 5 curve may be sufficient distally and effectively as LTV. However, for patients with a preoperative trunk shift greater than 17.0 mm or LIV rotation greater than 25.3°, LIV selection should be conservative in case of implanted-related complications.