Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the difference of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and open operation for mid and distal rectal cancer.Methods: A total of 138 patients with mid-lower rectal cancer were randomly assigned to laparoscopic surgery group(n=67) and open surgery group(n=71) from September 2008 to July 2011.Data about the patients' demographics,operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected retrospectively.Comparison of the short-term outcomes was performed between the two groups.Results: Anterior resection was performed in 65.7%(44/67)patients of the laparoscopic surgery group and 60.6%(43/71)patients of the open surgery group.The operating time of the laparoscopic surgery group [(176.4±68.3) min] was longer than the open surgery group [(122.7±42.5) min],and the difference is significant(P<0.05).The blood loss in the laparoscopic surgery group [(86.9±37.6)ml] was less than the open group [(119.1±32.7)ml],and the difference is significant(P<0.05).Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection had a shorter analgesic time,an earlier return of bowel function,a shorter indwelling catheter time,as well as a shorter hospital stay.There were no significant differences in the number of lymph nodes harvested,specimen length,the rate of positive circumfeential margins,as well as the length of distal margin between the two groups.Conversion to conventional surgery was necessary in two cases(2.99%).There were no significant differences in the rate of perioperative complications between the two groups,four in the laparoscopic surgery group and six in the open surgery group.Conclusions: Compared with open operation,laparoscopic TME for mid and distal rectal cancer is a safe and effective option for less blood loss,faster recovery,less pain,less postoperative complications and short hospitalization,while the short-term outcomes of the two methods is similar.

Preoperative evaluation of the resectability of low rectal cancer

Pre-operative radiochemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer.

The application of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with preservation of anal sphincter for rectal cancer

Characteristics And Prognostic Significance Of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin In Rectal Cancer

[Standardized Examination and Research Advancement of Circumferential Resection Margin in Patients with Middle-Lower Rectal Cancer].

Preoperative MRI evaluation of low rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision

Current Status of Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Cancer in China

Clinical Status and Future Prospects of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision

Several Critical Issues of Low Rectal Cancer Surgery

[Re-Evaluation of the Clinical Significance of TNM Staging of Mid-Low Rectal Cancer].

Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer

Concept and strategy of preoperative chemoradiation for mid-low rectal cancer in China, Japan and Korea

Complications and countermeasures of lower rectal cancer following surgical resection

Incidence, Predictors and Prognostic Implications of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Chinese High-Volume Cancer Center.

Optimal Timing of Surgery for Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: How We Choose

Advancements and challenges in standardized pathologic assessment in rectal cancer

Precise assessment of low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging

Quality control in the surgery of rectal cancer

Clinical research combining preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging with laparoscopic surgery on the therapy of rectal carcinoma

Evaluation of current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis