Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in definition of tumor invasion depth staging (T staging) before operation.METHODS:Clinical and radiographic data of 49 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical resection within two weeks after 3.0 T high-resolution MRI examination without preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Peking University People's Hospital between February 2015 and November 2015 were retrospectively collected. Two radiologists reviewed the MRI imagines and evaluated the location and T staging of rectal cancer independently(radiologist A and B). The kappa statistics was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement, and kappa value greater than 0.81 indicated excellent agreement. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution MRI in definition of rectal cancer T staging were assessed with pathological result as golden standard.RESULTS:According to pathological result of 49 rectal cancer patients, 3 were pT1, 17 were pT2, 22 were pT3, and 7 were pT4a. In 2 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed focal or diffuse significantly higher signal close to perirectal fat. And in other 47 patients of non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed equal or higher signal compared with pelvic muscle. Interobserver agreement was excellent in diagnosis of T staging of rectal cancer with 3.0T high-resolution MRI(Kappa=0.87). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T1 staging was 95.9%(47/49), 1/3 and 100%(46/46) respectively, besides, 1 case was both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. For 2 radiologists, the accuracy of T2 staging was 87.8%(43/49) and 91.8%(45/49) respectively, the sensitivity was both 88.2%(15/17), and the specificity was 87.5%(28/32) and 93.5%(30/32) respectively, besides, 15 cases were both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. The accuracy for T3 staging was 89.8%(44/49) and 93.9%(46/49) respectively, the sensitivity was 86.4%(19/22) and 95.5%(21/22) respectively, and the specificity was both 92.6%(25/27). Radiologist A made correct diagnosis for 19 cases, understaged 2 cases and overstaged 1 case. Radiologist B made correct diagnosis for 21 cases and only overstaged 1 case. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T4a staging was 98.0%(48/49), 7/7 and 97.6%(41/42) respectively, besides, 7 cases were both diagnosed correctly. The overall accuracy of T staging was 85.7%(42/49) and 89.8%(44/49) by two radiologists respectively. The accuracy for differentiating T1/T2 from T3/T4 was 91.8%(45/49) and 95.9%(47/49) by two radiologists respectively. Radiologist A overstaged 2 cases and understaged 2 cases, and radiologist B overstaged 2 cases.CONCLUSION:High-resolution MRI can accurately evaluate preoperative T staging of rectal cancer and help select the high-risk rectal cancer patients with over T3 to receive neoadjuvant treatment.

Precise assessment of low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging

Characteristics And Prognostic Significance Of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin In Rectal Cancer

Accuracy of High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Tumor Staging and Circumferential Resection Margin of Rectal Carcinoma

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of mesorectum involved by resectable rectal cancer

Sphincter-preserving Surgery for Low-Middle Rectal Cancer: Can We Predict Feasibility with High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Progress of MRI in predicting the circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer: A narrative review

The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation

The application and research of MRI in the evaluation of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

Assessment of T Staging and Mesorectal Fascia Status Using High-Resolution Mri in Rectal Cancer with Rectal Distention

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

[Assessment of Lymph Node Status in Rectal Cancer by Imaging].

Is There a Benefit in Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prediction of Preoperative Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?

Diagnostic Value of 3.0-Tesla High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Invasion Depth of ;rectal Cancer

Recognition Of Anterior Peritoneal Reflections And Their Relationship With Rectal Tumors Using Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

[Evaluation of the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging].

APPLICATION OF MRI IN PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING IN RECTAL CANCER

Preoperative evaluation of the resectability of low rectal cancer

Clinical research combining preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging with laparoscopic surgery on the therapy of rectal carcinoma

Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Imaging Beyond Morphology

Application of 3.0T MRI in the preoperative assessment of rectal carcinoma

Value of high-spatial-resolution MRI imaging in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma