Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the difference of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and open operation for mid and distal rectal cancer.Methods: A total of 138 patients with mid-lower rectal cancer were randomly assigned to laparoscopic surgery group(n=67) and open surgery group(n=71) from September 2008 to July 2011.Data about the patients' demographics,operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected retrospectively.Comparison of the short-term outcomes was performed between the two groups.Results: Anterior resection was performed in 65.7%(44/67)patients of the laparoscopic surgery group and 60.6%(43/71)patients of the open surgery group.The operating time of the laparoscopic surgery group [(176.4±68.3) min] was longer than the open surgery group [(122.7±42.5) min],and the difference is significant(P<0.05).The blood loss in the laparoscopic surgery group [(86.9±37.6)ml] was less than the open group [(119.1±32.7)ml],and the difference is significant(P<0.05).Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection had a shorter analgesic time,an earlier return of bowel function,a shorter indwelling catheter time,as well as a shorter hospital stay.There were no significant differences in the number of lymph nodes harvested,specimen length,the rate of positive circumfeential margins,as well as the length of distal margin between the two groups.Conversion to conventional surgery was necessary in two cases(2.99%).There were no significant differences in the rate of perioperative complications between the two groups,four in the laparoscopic surgery group and six in the open surgery group.Conclusions: Compared with open operation,laparoscopic TME for mid and distal rectal cancer is a safe and effective option for less blood loss,faster recovery,less pain,less postoperative complications and short hospitalization,while the short-term outcomes of the two methods is similar.

Quality control in the surgery of rectal cancer

[Quality control of laparoscopic colorectal surgery].

Surgical quality control of TME and ELAPE procedure for rectal cancer

The application of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with preservation of anal sphincter for rectal cancer

[Perceptions of transanal total mesorectal excision surgical quality and patient screening]

[Anatomical Planes and Landmarks of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer and Prophylaxis of Intraoperative Complications].

Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer

[Quality control of digestive tract reconstruction in colorectal surgery]

[Standardized Examination and Research Advancement of Circumferential Resection Margin in Patients with Middle-Lower Rectal Cancer].

Development and Evaluation of Complete Mesocolic Excision in treating colon cancers

Preoperative evaluation of the resectability of low rectal cancer

Quality assessment of surgery for colorectal cancer: Where do we stand?

Anatomical Characteristics of the Rectal Cancers for Laparoscopic Radical Operation

Clinical Status and Future Prospects of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision

Morbidity, Mortality, and Pathologic Outcomes of Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

[Further Understanding of the Complete Mesocolic Excision Concept: Controversy and Consensus].

Is It Time To Define Complete Mesocolic Excision As A Standardized Colon Cancer Surgery?

Conduct high-quality clinical studies in rectal cancer surgery based upon the IDEAL frame-work and recommendations

Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer

Technique of complete mesocolic excision of colon cancers

Results after Change of Treatment Policy for Rectal Cancer – Report from a Single Hospital in China