The Comparison of the Breast Volume Measurements in Clinical Application

Peiru MIN,Wenjing XI,Weijie SU,Shaoqing FENG,Trisliana Aurelia,Zheming PU,Yan ZHANG,Yixin ZHANG,Pacchioni Lucrezia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2013.06.006
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare all the breast volume measurement methods in order to provide reference for clinical practice and study. Methods PubMed and Wanfang are searched for articles on the topic of breast volume measurement. All the reported methods were reviewed in the terms of mechanism, reliability and feasibility. Results 46 articles published from 1970 to 2013 meet our inclusion criteria and were reviewed. All the volume measurements in the article could be classified into three categories, ① the radiology method which included MRI, ultrasound and CT; ② the natural method which included 3D modeling, water displacement and cast; ③ the geometry method which included Grossman-Rounder device, anthropometry and mammography. Conclusion Among the 9 breast volume measurements, 3D, MRI are relatively more reliable and could be used to aid surgical planning. Other methods such as Grossman-rounder and anthropometry are less reliable but more convenient and economic, they could be applied in researches with big sample.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?